首页> 外文期刊>Hystrix: Italian Journal of Mammalogy >A non-invasive monitoring on European wildcat ( Felis silvestris silvestris Schreber, 1777) in Sicily using hair trapping and camera trapping: does it work?
【24h】

A non-invasive monitoring on European wildcat ( Felis silvestris silvestris Schreber, 1777) in Sicily using hair trapping and camera trapping: does it work?

机译:使用诱捕和相机诱捕技术在西西里岛对欧洲野猫(Felis silvestris silvestris Schreber,1777年)进行非侵入式监控:这有效吗?

获取原文
       

摘要

An hair trapping protocol, with camera trapping surveillance, was carried out on the south-western side of the Etna, inhabited by an abundant population of the European wildcat. We aimed to collect hair for genetic analysis on the base of a field study conducted in Switzerland, where valerian tincture had been used to attract wildcats to rub again wooden sticks and therefore leaving hairs. We placed 18 hair trapping stations, plus one camera trap per scented wooden stick, 1 km away from each other for 60 days (October 29 2010 to December 28 2010). The rate of “capture” success (1 capture / 24.5 trap-days) by camera trapping was substantially the same as those obtained during previous surveys performed in the same study area without the use of any attractants. No wildcats were photographed while rubbing against the wooden sticks, neither any wildcat was interested in the scent lure. We discuss limitations of the hair trapping, providing possible explanations on the failure of valerian tincture, while suggesting some field advices for future monitorings.
机译:在埃特纳火山的西南侧实施了诱捕方案,并进行了摄像机诱捕监控,该方案被大量欧洲野猫居住。我们的目标是在瑞士进行的一项野外研究的基础上,收集头发进行遗传分析,那里的缬草tin剂已被用来吸引野猫再次擦木棍,从而留出了毛发。我们放置了18个头发诱捕站,每个香味木棍加一个摄像头诱捕器,彼此之间相距1公里,持续60天(2010年10月29日至2010年12月28日)。通过相机诱集“捕获”成功率(1次捕获/24.5个捕获日)与在相同研究区域中不使用任何引诱剂的先前调查中获得的速率基本相同。在木棍上摩擦时,没有野猫被拍到照片,也没有野猫对这种香气感兴趣。我们讨论了毛发捕获的局限性,为缬草tin的失败提供了可能的解释,同时为将来的监测提出了一些现场建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号