首页> 外文期刊>JK Science : Journal of Medical Education & Research >A Study on Comparative Evaluation of Add-on Pralidoxime Therapy over Atropine in the Management of Organophosphorus Poisoning in a Tertiary Care Hospital
【24h】

A Study on Comparative Evaluation of Add-on Pralidoxime Therapy over Atropine in the Management of Organophosphorus Poisoning in a Tertiary Care Hospital

机译:三级医院医院对有机磷中毒管理中阿托品联合普利多肟治疗的比较评价研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Since its discovery in 1956, pralidoxime has been used in the management of organophosphorus poisoning (OP) in addition to atropine. While efficacy of atropine is proved beyond doubt, clinical experience with pralidoxime has led to widespread controversies about its efficacy in treatment of OP poisoning. In this study we compared the efficacy of add-on pralidoxime therapy over therapy with atropine alone in OP poisoning. In this open-label, parallel-group clinical study, patients of OP poisoning, presenting in emergency department of a tertiary care district hospital, were randomly allocated to receive either atropine or atropine plus pralidoxime. The parameters used for efficacy assessment were: mortality rate, requirement of ventilator and duration of stay in the hospital in either of the two treatment arms.The mortality rate, requirement of ventilator and duration of hospital stay in the two treatment arms failed to show any statistically significant difference. Add-on pralidoxime therapy over atropine monotherapy, does not offer any significant advantage in the management of OP poisoning.
机译:自从1956年被发现以来,除阿托品外,普利肟肟还用于有机磷中毒(OP)的管理中。尽管阿托品的功效已被证实是毋庸置疑的,但普利昔肟的临床经验已引起了关于其治疗OP中毒功效的广泛争议。在这项研究中,我们比较了在患者中毒中,与单独使用阿托品相比,联合使用吡咯肟肟治疗的疗效。在这项开放标签,平行分组的临床研究中,在三级护理区医院急诊科就诊的OP中毒患者被随机分配接受阿托品或阿托品加普利肟的治疗。疗效评估的参数为:两个治疗组的死亡率,呼吸机需求和住院时间,两个治疗组的死亡率,呼吸机需求和住院时间均未显示具有统计学意义的差异。与阿托品单一疗法相比,附加的吡咯肟肟疗法在OP中毒的治疗中没有任何明显的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号