首页> 外文期刊>JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies. >Users’ Perspectives, Opportunities, and Barriers of the Strengthen Your Ankle App for Evidence-Based Ankle Sprain Prevention: Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation for a Randomized Controlled Trial
【24h】

Users’ Perspectives, Opportunities, and Barriers of the Strengthen Your Ankle App for Evidence-Based Ankle Sprain Prevention: Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation for a Randomized Controlled Trial

机译:用户的观点,机会和障碍,以增强您的脚踝应用程序以防止循证踝关节扭伤:随机对照试验的混合方法过程评估

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: The “Strengthen Your Ankle” neuromuscular training program has been thoroughly studied over the past 8 years. This process evaluation is a part of a randomized controlled trial that examined both the short- and long-term effectiveness of this particular program. Although it was shown previously that the program, available both in a printed booklet and as a mobile app, is able to effectively reduce the number of recurrent ankle sprains, participants’ compliance with the program is an ongoing challenge. Objective: This process evaluation explored participants’ opinions regarding both the methods of delivery, using RE-AIM (Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance) Framework to identify barriers and challenges to program compliance. Although Reach, Effectiveness, and Adaptation were the focus of a previous study, this paper focuses on the implementation and maintenance phases. Methods: Semistructured interviews and online questionnaires were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Fisher exact, chi-square, and t tests assessed between-group differences in quantitative survey responses. Interviews were assessed by thematic analysis to identify key themes. Results: While there were no significant differences in the perceived simplicity, usefulness, and liking of the exercise during the 8 weeks of the neuromuscular training program, semistructured interviews showed that 14 of 16 participants agreed that an app would be of additional benefits over a booklet. After the 12-month follow-up, when asked how they evaluated the overall use of the app or the booklet, the users of the app gave a mean score of 7.7 (SD 0.99) versus a mean score 7.1 (SD 1.23) for the users of the booklet. This difference in mean score was significant ( P =.006). Conclusions: Although both the app and booklet showed a high user satisfaction, the users of the app were significantly more satisfied. Semistructured questionnaires allowed users to address issues they would like to improve in future updates. Including a possibility for feedback and postponement of exercises, an explanation of the use of specific exercises and possibly music were identified as features that might further improve the contentment of the program, probably leading to increased compliance.
机译:背景:在过去的8年中,对“加强脚踝”神经肌肉训练计划进行了彻底的研究。此过程评估是随机对照试验的一部分,该试验检查了此特定程序的短期和长期有效性。尽管以前已经证明该程序既可以在印刷版小册子中使用,也可以作为移动应用程序使用,它能够有效地减少复发性踝关节扭伤的次数,但参与者对该程序的依从性仍是一个持续的挑战。目标:此过程评估使用RE-AIM(有效性实施采用实施维护)框架来确定参与者对两种交付方法的意见,以识别计划合规性的障碍和挑战。尽管“覆盖率”,“有效性”和“适应性”是先前研究的重点,但本文重点关注实施和维护阶段。方法:采用定性内容分析法对半结构式访谈和在线问卷进行分析。 Fisher精确,卡方检验和t检验评估了定量调查响应中的组间差异。通过主题分析对访谈进行评估,以识别关键主题。结果:尽管在8周的神经肌肉训练计划中,运动的简单性,实用性和喜好程度没有显着差异,但半结构化访谈显示,在16名参与者中,有14名同意,与小册子相比,应用程序会有更多好处。经过12个月的跟踪调查后,当被问及他们如何评估该应用程序或手册的整体使用情况时,该应用程序的用户给出的平均得分为7.7(标清0.99),而平均得分为7.1(标清1.23)。手册的用户。平均得分的这种差异是显着的(P = .006)。结论:尽管该应用程序和小册子均显示出很高的用户满意度,但该应用程序的用户却明显更满意。半结构化问卷使用户能够解决他们希望在将来的更新中改进的问题。包括反馈和推迟练习的可能性,对特定练习和音乐的使用的解释被确定为可以进一步改善程序满意度的功能,可能会增加合规性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号