首页> 外文期刊>JA Clinical Reports >Peripheral nerve block combined with general anesthesia for lower extremity amputation in hemodialysis patients: case series
【24h】

Peripheral nerve block combined with general anesthesia for lower extremity amputation in hemodialysis patients: case series

机译:周围神经阻滞联合全身麻醉在血液透析患者下肢截肢中的应用

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract BackgroundAnesthetic management of lower extremity amputation in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients can be challenging because of their poor cardiovascular status. As previously reported, peripheral nerve block (PNB) may be beneficial in these complicated cases. We report the effects of PNB combined with general anesthesia on hemodynamic stability in HD patients undergoing elective lower extremity amputation.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 13 HD patients who underwent lower extremity amputation. Patients received general anesthesia (GA group, n =?7) or general anesthesia combined with PNB (GA with PNB group, n =?6), as decided by the anesthesiologists. Mean blood pressure (MBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), lowest BP, heart rate (HR), blood loss, fluid and blood infusion volumes, and doses of vasopressors required were compared for hemodynamic assessment. The coefficient of variation ( ( mathrm{CV}=upsigma /overline{mathcal{X}} ) ) of MBP (CVMBP) and SBP (CVSBP) was calculated to compare hemodynamic stability. Intraoperative opioid use and postoperative pain scores at rest using a numerical rating scale (NRS) on postoperative days 0 and 1 were compared for pain assessment. We also assessed 30-day mortality.ResultsCVMBP in the GA group was significantly higher than that in the GA with PNB group (0.15?±?0.05 and 0.08?±?0.04, respectively, p =?0.03). The CVSBP in the GA group was also significantly higher than that in the GA with PNB group (0.16?±?0.02 and 0.09?±?0.01, respectively, p =?0.03). No significant differences in other hemodynamic parameters were observed. Intraoperative fentanyl doses were significantly lower in the GA with PNB group (GA 210.7?±?99.9?μg vs. GA with PNB 113.0?±?75.6?μg, p =?0.04). There were no significant differences in other pain parameters and 30-day mortality between the groups.ConclusionOur results suggest that PNB combined with general anesthesia contributes to intraoperative hemodynamic stability through better pain control in HD patients undergoing lower extremity amputation.
机译:摘要背景慢性血液透析(HD)患者下肢截肢的麻醉管理可能因其心血管状况不佳而面临挑战。如先前的报道,在这些复杂的情况下,周围神经阻滞(PNB)可能是有益的。我们报告了P​​NB联合全身麻醉对选择性下肢截肢的HD患者血液动力学稳定性的影响。方法我们回顾性分析了13例下肢截肢的HD患者。根据麻醉医师的决定,患者接受全身麻醉(GA组,n =?7)或全身麻醉联合PNB(GA并PNB组,n =?6)。比较平均血压(MBP),收缩压(SBP),最低血压,心率(HR),失血量,输液量和输血量以及所需的升压药剂量进行血流动力学评估。计算MBP(CVMBP)和SBP(CVSBP)的变异系数(( mathrm {CV} = upsigma / overline { mathcal {X}} ))以比较血液动力学稳定性。比较术中使用阿片类药物和术后第0天和第1天使用数字评分量表(NRS)进行的休息时疼痛评分,以评估疼痛程度。我们还评估了30天的死亡率。结果GA组的CVMBP显着高于PNB组的GA(分别为0.15?±?0.05和0.08?±?0.04,p =?0.03)。 GA组的CVSBP也显着高于PNB组的CVSBP(分别为0.16±±0.02和0.09±±0.01,p =≥0.03)。没有观察到其他血液动力学参数的显着差异。 PNB组GA的术中芬太尼剂量显着降低(GA 210.7±±99.9μg,而PNB 113.0±±75.6μg,p = 0.04)。两组之间的其他疼痛参数和30天死亡率无显着差异。结论我们的结果表明,PNB联合全身麻醉可通过更好地控制下肢截肢的HD患者的术中血流动力学稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号