...
首页> 外文期刊>Japanese Journal of Pharmacology >A NEW FINDING ON THE PAPER CHROMATOGRAPHY OF DIGITALIS GLYCOSIDES
【24h】

A NEW FINDING ON THE PAPER CHROMATOGRAPHY OF DIGITALIS GLYCOSIDES

机译:狄氏糖苷的纸层析新发现

获取原文

摘要

References(2) Among the methods of the paper chromatography of digitalis glycosides, that of the Svendsen and Jensen's is widely used. It uses the mixture of chloroform, methyl alcohol and water for development and trichloroacetic acid for producing fluorescence. Our experiment has shown that there is a kind of digitoxin which does not produce fluorescence with trichloroacetic acid.Digitoxin made by Merck Co. of Germany (Dm), when developed on filter paper strip with the mixture of chloroform, methyl alcohol and water and heated with trichloroacetic acid, evidently produced two fluorescent spots with Rf values characteristic of digitoxin and gitoxin, in ultra-violet light. But digitoxin made by Rosenthal-Bercow Co. of the U.S.A. (Dr), when treated by the same method, produced only one fluorescent spot of gitoxin and none of digitoxin even if a large quantity of material was used. If, in that case, other reagent, for example Raymond's, was used, digitoxin contained in Dr was found on the spot of filter paper that had the same Rf value as that of Dm.As both Dm and Dr contained some quantity of gitoxin, they were purified by the chromatography. After materials dissolved in ethyl acetate containing mehtyl alcohol by 0.5 volume per cent, were passed through the column plugged with silica gel, the portions positive in the Keller-Kiliani's reaction were gathered-from filtrates. In these substances could no gitoxin spot be found by the paper chromatography. Therefore these substances were considered to be almost purified.These two kinds of purified digitoxin were alike in several chemical reactions and had no appreciable difference in biological action on the frog heart. However, purified Dr did not produce fluorescence while purified Dm did.As a result of these studies, it has been shown that there are two kinds of digitoxin and that it is not desirable to depend only upon the method of Svendsen and Jensen's in the paper chromatography of digitalis glycosides.
机译:参考文献(2)在洋地黄苷的纸层析方法中,Svendsen和Jensen法广泛使用。它使用氯仿,甲醇和水的混合物进行显影,并使用三氯乙酸产生荧光。我们的实验表明存在一种不会在三氯乙酸中产生荧光的洋地黄毒。德国默克公司(Dm)生产的地高辛是在氯仿,甲醇和水的混合物中于滤纸条上显影并加热后制得的。与三氯乙酸一起,在紫外光下显然产生了两个荧光斑点,具有Rf值的洋地黄毒毒素和胃泌素特征。但是,由美国Rosenthal-Bercow Co.(Dr)制造的洋地黄毒素,用相同的方法处理时,即使使用了大量的物质,也仅产生了一种荧光素的荧光素,而没有洋地黄毒素。在这种情况下,如果使用其他试剂(例如雷蒙德试剂),则在滤纸上发现Dr中所含的洋地黄毒素具有与Dm相同的Rf值。由于Dm和Dr中都含有一定量的胃泌素,它们通过色谱纯化。使溶于0.5%(体积)甲醇乙醇的乙酸乙酯中的物质通过装有硅胶的柱子后,从滤液中收集在Keller-Kiliani反应中呈阳性的部分。在这些物质中,通过纸色谱法没有发现毒素。因此,这些物质被认为是几乎纯化的。这两种纯化的洋地黄毒苷在几个化学反应中是相似的,并且对蛙心的生物学作用没有明显的差异。然而,纯化的Dr却不产生荧光,而纯化的Dm却产生荧光。这些研究的结果表明,存在两种洋地黄毒苷,并且不希望仅依赖于Svendsen和Jensen的方法。洋地黄苷的色谱分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号