首页> 外文期刊>Jena Economic Research Papers >EU-US differences in the size of R&D intensive firms: Do they explain the overall R&D intensity gap?
【24h】

EU-US differences in the size of R&D intensive firms: Do they explain the overall R&D intensity gap?

机译:欧美研发密集型企业规模上的差异:它们是否解释了总体研发密集型差距?

获取原文
       

摘要

The average firm size of the top R&D investors among US-based companies is smaller than that of the EU-based firms. Does this help to explain why the US has a greater R&D intensity, or is the higher firm size in the EU, just as its lower R&D intensity, determined by the sectors in which the top R&D investors are operating? Using data on the top-R&D investors from the 2006 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard, the size differential between R&D performers in the EU and US is more closely examined. A first observation is that, despite great differences between sectors, the overall distribution of companies' R&D investments in both economies is remarkably similar, as opposed to the distribution of the R&D/sales ratios of the same two sets of companies. The notion that size plays a role, independent of the sectoral composition of R&D, is then confirmed by regression analysis. In the US as well as in the EU, smaller sized Scoreboard companies tend to spend a larger proportion of their income from sales on R&D.
机译:美国公司中顶级研发投资者的平均公司规模小于欧盟公司。这是否有助于解释为什么美国的研发强度更高,还是欧盟的公司规模更大,而研发强度却较低,这取决于顶级研发投资者经营的行业呢?使用2006年欧盟工业R&D投资记分板中顶级R&D投资者的数据,可以更仔细地研究欧盟和美国R&D执行者之间的规模差异。第一个观察结果是,尽管各部门之间存在很大差异,但两个经济体中公司的R&D投资的总体分布却非常相似,这与相同的两组公司的R / D /销售比率的分布不同。然后,通过回归分析可以确认规模发挥作用的概念,而与研发部门的构成无关。在美国和欧盟,规模较小的记分板公司倾向于将其销售收入的很大一部分用于研发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号