首页> 外文期刊>The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine >Comparative Study between 'Onlay' Versus 'Retrorectus' Hernioplasty in Management of Uncomplicated Venteral Hernias
【24h】

Comparative Study between 'Onlay' Versus 'Retrorectus' Hernioplasty in Management of Uncomplicated Venteral Hernias

机译:单纯性疝修补术与“直肠”疝修补术的比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Hernias of the anterior abdominal wall, or ventral hernias have a various types that can be categorized into either congenital or acquired, also can be categorized according to various locations into primary ventral hernias (true ventral- non incisional hernias) which include two subtypes lateral ventral hernia, and midline ventral hernias. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare between two techniques of mesh placement in uncomplicated ventral hernias, onlay (mesh on external oblique) versus sublay (mesh in the retromuscular space), regarding the operative technique and the postoperative complications. Patients and Methods: In this study, a comparative study between two methods of surgical treatment for ventral hernia was made. The study included 40 adult patients with uncomplicated ventral hernia divided randomly into two groups according to the surgical technique used for the repair, without any specific criteria used in selection for any technique as follows : Group A (Onlay mesh repair): Twenty patients were operated by placing the mesh above the anterior rectus sheath and the external oblique muscle. Group B (Sublay "Reteromuscular" mesh repair): Twenty patients were operated by placing the mesh in the retro- muscular space. Results: In this study no significant difference found between both methods as regarding: Age and gender, type of ventral hernia. Duration of the operative procedure. Amount of intra- operative blood loss. Postoperative hospital stay. Hernia recurrence. Conclusion: Sublay (Retromuscular) mesh repair is a good alternative to onlay mesh repairs, this study advocates this method of ventral hernia repair as it is applicable to all sites of ventral hernia, the mesh is mostly hidden and anchored behind the rectus sheath, the complication rate is low and there is a low recurrence rate and finally We suggest carrying out more trials on the retromuscular mesh repair technique to include a bigger number of cases and a longer period of follow up.
机译:背景:前腹壁疝或腹侧疝有多种类型,可分为先天性或后天性,也可根据不同部位分为原发性腹侧疝(真正的腹侧非切开性疝),包括两种亚型外侧腹疝和中线腹疝。目的:本研究的目的是比较两种简单的术式在单纯性腹侧疝的植入技术(内斜肌上网)与亚嵌层(后肌间隙内网)之间的手术技术和术后并发症。患者与方法:在这项研究中,对两种腹疝的手术治疗方法进行了比较研究。该研究纳入了40例单纯性腹疝的成年患者,根据用于修复的手术技术将其随机分为两组,但在选择任何技术时未使用任何特定标准,如下所示:A组(网状修复):手术20例通过将网布置于前直肌鞘和外斜肌上方。 B组(子宫颈“眼底肌”网片修复):20例患者通过将网片放置在后肌间隙进行手术。结果:在这项研究中,两种方法在以下方面均无显着差异:年龄和性别,腹疝的类型。手术过程的持续时间。术中失血量。术后住院。疝气复发。结论:地下(网膜)网状修补术是覆盖式网状修补术的一种很好的替代方法,该研究提倡采用腹侧疝修补术,因为该方法适用于腹侧疝的所有部位,网状组织大部分隐藏并锚固在直肌鞘的后面,并发症发生率低且复发率低,最后我们建议对肌注后肌网修复技术进行更多的试验,以包括更多的病例和更长的随访时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号