...
首页> 外文期刊>Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente >Transformando camponeses de subsistência em servos de ecossistemas: desigualdade e a produ??o de recursos naturais na República Democrática Popular do Laos
【24h】

Transformando camponeses de subsistência em servos de ecossistemas: desigualdade e a produ??o de recursos naturais na República Democrática Popular do Laos

机译:将自给自足的农民转变为生态系统的仆人:老挝人民民主共和国的不平等与自然资源的生产

获取原文

摘要

This paper examines the nexus of nature conservation, productivity and domination in inclusive conservation approaches. It argues that the turning of subsistence peasants into “stewards and custodians of biodiversity” (CBD) represents a soft form of domination according to the false alternatives of ecological instrumentality in that local development is subordinated to supposed “natural” constraints. The argument draws from critical theories of societal nature relations (Horkheimer & Adorno, 2002; G?rg. 2003; Moore, 2015) as well as from extensive research on ecotourism as an instrument to reconcile conservation and development in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic. From this angle, conservation is seen as a way to produce “natural” resources building on, perpetuating and creating various social inequities, based on the fiction that “nature” is essentially non-human. This case is made with regard to National Protected Areas in Laos, which are designed explicitly to accommodate local people’s needs. Among other things, ecotourism is employed to create a source of income alternative to practices seen as “unsustainable”. Thereby, economic and also moral stakes in untouched resources are to be implanted. In such way, a compromise between (rather than a reconciliation of) conservation and development is imposed which is largely alien to the lived realities of local people, and only accounting partly for their needs and aspirations – an imposition which tends to produce its own countercurrents, again tying into productivity and inequality. This paper thus analyzes the workings of the nature/society dualism underlying ecological instrumentality as experienced in ecotourism as a tool for nature conservation in Laos.
机译:本文探讨了包容性保护方法中自然保护,生产力和控制的关系。它认为,根据生态工具的错误选择,将自给自足的农民转变为“生物多样性的管理者和监护人”(CBD)代表一种软性的统治方式,因为地方发展受制于所谓的“自然”约束。该论点源于社会自然关系的批判理论(Horkheimer&Adorno,2002; G?rg。2003; Moore,2015),以及对生态旅游的广泛研究,将生态旅游作为调和老挝人民民主共和国保护与发展的手段。从这个角度来看,保护被视为一种基于“自然”本质上是非人类的虚构的,在各种社会不平等基础上建立,持久和创造各种“自然”资源的方式。该案例是针对老挝的国家保护区而设计的,明确地旨在满足当地人民的需求。除其他外,生态旅游被用来为替代被视为“不可持续”的做法创造收入来源。因此,将在原始资源中注入经济利益和道德利益。通过这种方式,在保护与发展之间(而不是调和)之间进行了折衷,这在很大程度上与当地人的生活现实息息相关,并且仅部分考虑了他们的需求和愿望-这种倾向往往会产生其自身的逆流。 ,再次将生产力和不平等联系在一起。因此,本文分析了生态旅游中作为生态保护老挝自然保护工具的生态工具背后的自然/社会二元论的工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号