...
首页> 外文期刊>Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics >A comparative clinical study of the failure rate of orthodontic brackets bonded with two adhesive systems: conventional and self-etching primer (SEP)
【24h】

A comparative clinical study of the failure rate of orthodontic brackets bonded with two adhesive systems: conventional and self-etching primer (SEP)

机译:两种常规系统和自蚀刻底漆(SEP)粘结的正畸托槽失败率的比较临床研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the clinical performance of orthodontic brackets bonded with Transbond adhesive paste after two priming systems: a two-stage conventional system (acid etching + Transbond XT adhesive primer) and a singlestage self-etching primer (SEP) (Transbond Plus). METHODS: The sample comprised 480 metal brackets bonded to the teeth of 24 consecutive patients treated for 36 to 48 months. A split-mouth design was used for bonding, and both systems were used in each patient. Bracket failure rates for each system were analyzed; and failure causes as reported by the patients and the quadrant of teeth for which brackets failed were recorded. RESULTS: The conventional system group had a failure rate of 5.41%, whereas the rate for SEP was 4.58%. In this group, there were 5 failures (38.4%) in the right maxillary quadrant, 2 (15.4%) in the left maxillary quadrant, 4 (30.8%) in the right mandibular quadrant, and 2 (15.4%) in the left mandibular quadrant. In the SEP group, there were 4 (36.4%) failures in the right maxillary quadrant, 1 (9%) in the left maxillary quadrant, 3 (27.3%) in the right mandibular quadrant, and 3 (27.3%) in the left mandibular quadrant. Results of descriptive statistical analysis and odds ratio did not show any significant differences between rates (p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: The clinical efficiency of SEP was similar to that of the conventional system.
机译:目的:本研究比较了两种底漆系统:两阶段常规系统(酸蚀刻+ Transbond XT粘合剂底漆)和单阶段自蚀刻底漆(SEP)(Transbond Plus)后用Transbond胶粘贴的正畸托槽的临床性能。方法:该样本包括480个金属托槽,这些托槽与连续治疗36至48个月的24例患者的牙齿相连。开口设计用于粘接,每位患者均使用两种系统。分析了每个系统的支架故障率;记录患者的失败原因和托槽失败的牙齿象限。结果:常规系统组的失败率为5.41%,而SEP的失败率为4.58%。在该组中,右上颌象限有5例(38.4%),左上象限有2例(15.4%),右下颌象限有4例(30.8%),左下颌有2例(15.4%)象限。在SEP组中,右上颌象限发生4例(36.4%),左上象限发生1例(9%),右下颌象限3例(27.3%),左3例(27.3%)下颌象限。描述性统计分析和比值比的结果在比率之间没有显示任何显着差异(p = 0.67)。结论:SEP的临床疗效与常规系统相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号