...
首页> 外文期刊>Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics >Separation and pain perception of Elastomeric, Kesling and Kansal separators
【24h】

Separation and pain perception of Elastomeric, Kesling and Kansal separators

机译:弹性体,凯斯林和堪萨尔分离器的分离和疼痛感

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Various types of separators have been advocated, but the ideal separator should produce optimum separation with minimal pain and discomfort. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the amount of separation achieved by three different types of separators (Elastomeric, Kesling and Kansal), and to assess the associated pain and discomfort. Methods: A random single-blind split-mouth study was conducted on 108 patients seeking fixed orthodontic treatment, in which two different separators were used on each side in both the arches for a single patient. After five days, the amount of separation was measured with a feeler gauge. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scoring was performed by the patient on each day, to evaluate pain perception. Discomfort was evaluated by questionnaire filled by the patient at the time of separator removal. Results: The greatest amount of separation was seen with the elastomeric separators, while the smallest separation was seen with Kansal separators. VAS scoring showed maximum pain at day 1 with all the three separator types. Highest pain was perceived in the Elastomeric separators group, followed by Kesling and Kansal separators, respectively. Statistically significant difference was found in VAS score of Elastomeric separators, when compared to both Kesling and Kansal, on day 1 and 2 ( p = 0.001). Analysis of the questionnaires revealed that a greater number of patients experienced discomfort with elastomeric separators placement (69.4%), which was statistically significant ( p 0.01) when compared to the other two types of separators. Answers to the other questions were comparable, except for the need for medications, which was reportedly highest with elastomeric separators. Conclusion: Kesling separators produce adequate separation with minimal discomfort and pain, compared to Elastomeric and Kansal separators.
机译:简介:已提倡使用各种类型的分隔器,但理想的分隔器应能产生最佳的分隔效果,同时最大程度地减少痛苦和不适感。目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较三种不同类型的分离器(弹性体,凯斯林和堪萨尔州)所实现的分离量,并评估相关的疼痛和不适感。方法:对108名寻求固定正畸治疗的患者进行了随机单盲裂口研究,其中单人在两个足弓的两侧各使用两个不同的隔板。五天后,用塞尺测量分离量。每天由患者进行视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,以评估疼痛感。通过移除隔膜时患者填写的问卷评估不适感。结果:弹性体分离器的分离量最大,而堪萨尔分离器的分离量最小。在所有三种隔膜类型中,VAS评分显示第1天的最大痛苦。弹性分离器组的疼痛最高,其次分别是Kesling和Kansal分离器。在第1天和第2天,与Kesling和Kansal相比,弹性体隔板的VAS评分存在统计学差异(p = 0.001)。对问卷的分析显示,更多的患者因使用弹性体隔膜而感到不适(69.4%),与其他两种隔膜相比,具有统计学意义(p <0.01)。除药物需求外,其他问题的答案是可比的,据报道,药物需求最高的是弹性体隔板。结论:与弹性体和Kansal分离器相比,Kesling分离器可产生足够的分离,同时将不适和疼痛降至最低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号