首页> 外文期刊>Dental Materials Journal >Influence of different composite materials and cavity preparation designs on the fracture resistance of mesio-occluso-distal inlay restoration
【24h】

Influence of different composite materials and cavity preparation designs on the fracture resistance of mesio-occluso-distal inlay restoration

机译:不同复合材料和腔体制备设计对近颌远中嵌体修复体抗断裂性能的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

The aim of the study to evaluate the fracture resistance of a computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and three indirect composite materials for three different mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) inlay cavity designs. A total of 120 mandibular third molar were divided into three groups: (G1) non-proximal box, (G2) 2-mm proximal box, and (G3) 4-mm proximal box. Each cavity design received four composite materials: Estenia, Epricord (Kuraray, Japan), Tescera (Bisco, USA), and Cerasmart CAD/CAM blocks (GC, USA). The specimens were subjected to a compressive load at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data was analyzed using the two-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc test (p <0.05). Estenia exhibited significantly higher fracture strength than Epricord and Cerasmart in G1. In G2 and G3, there was no significant difference among the four materials. Using a non-proximal box design for the cavity can improve the fracture resistance of the inlay restoration.
机译:研究的目的是评估计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD / CAM)和三种间接复合材料对三种不同的近-咬合-远端(MOD)镶嵌腔设计的抗断裂性能。将总共​​120个下颌第三磨牙分为三组:(G1)非近端牙槽盒,(G2)2毫米近端牙槽盒和(G3)4毫米近端牙槽盒。每个腔体设计都接受四种复合材料:Estenia,Epricord(日本可乐丽),Tescera(美国Bisco)和Cerasmart CAD / CAM块(美国GC)。使样品以1mm / min的十字头速度经受压缩载荷。使用方差和Bonferroni事后检验(> 0.05)的双向分析对数据进行分析。在G1中,爱沙尼亚的断裂强度明显高于Epricord和Cerasmart。在G2和G3中,四种材料之间没有显着差异。对型腔使用非近端盒设计可以提高镶嵌修复体的抗断裂性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号