...
首页> 外文期刊>Dental Hypotheses >Effect of different curing modes on the degree of conversion and the microhardness of different composite restorations
【24h】

Effect of different curing modes on the degree of conversion and the microhardness of different composite restorations

机译:不同固化方式对不同复合修复体转化度和显微硬度的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: This study aims to evaluate the effects of different curing units and modes on the degree of conversion (DC) and microhardness (MH) of two different resin composites [ESTELITE ∑ QUICK (EQ), and Z350 XT (Z3)]. Materials and Methods: One hundred (100) discs of each tested material were made and divided into two subgroups (n = 50) according to the discs' dimensions: 5 mm diameter × 2 mm thickness, and 2 mm diameter × 2 mm thickness. Each subgroup was further subdivided into the following five classes (n = 10): I) cured with halogen light curing-unit; II) cured with light-emitting diode (LED) unit; III) cured with argon laser; IV) cured with halogen light-curing unit for 5 s, 10 s rest followed by 20 s curing; and V) cured with halogen light-curing unit for 10 s, then 10 s rest, followed by 10 s curing. The first subgroup was tested for MH using the Vickers Microhardness tester and the second subgroup was tested for DC using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test P < 0.05. Results: Specimens in class IV showed the highest mean DC and MH, followed by class III, then class II. Class I showed significantly lower mean values for both DC and MH. On the other hand, Z3 showed statistically significantly higher mean DC and MH than EQ. Conclusion: Although the two tested composites did not perform similarly under the test conditions, curing with halogen unit for 5 s, then 10 s rest, followed by 10 s curing improved the DC and the MH of both the tested materials.
机译:简介:本研究旨在评估不同固化单元和方式对两种不同树脂复合材料[ESTELITE ∑ QUICK(EQ)和Z350 XT(Z3)]的转化率(DC)和显微硬度(MH)的影响。材料和方法:制作一百(100)种每种测试材料的圆盘,并根据圆盘的尺寸将其分为两个子组(n = 50):直径5 mm×厚度2 mm,直径2 mm×2 mm。每个亚组又细分为以下五类(n = 10):I)用卤素灯固化单元固化; II)用发光二极管(LED)单元固化; III)用氩激光固化; IV)用卤素光固化单元固化5s,静置10s,然后固化20s; V)用卤素光固化装置固化10秒钟,然后静置10秒钟,然后固化10秒钟。第一组使用维氏显微硬度测试仪进行MH测试,第二组使用傅立叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)测试DC。使用双向方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验P <0.05对数据进行统计分析。结果:IV类标本的平均DC和MH最高,其次是III类,然后是II类。 I类对DC和MH均显示出明显较低的平均值。另一方面,Z3的平均DC和MH在统计上显着高于EQ。结论:尽管两种测试的复合材料在测试条件下的性能均不相同,但用卤素单元固化5秒钟,然后静置10秒钟,再固化10秒钟,两种材料的DC和MH均得到改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号