首页> 外文期刊>Danishgah-i Ulum-i Pizishki va Khadamat-i Bihdashti-Darmani Shahid Sadugi Yazd. Majallah >Comparison of Sensitivity & Specificity of Transvaginal Sonography, Saline Infusion Sonohysterography and Hysteroscopy in Evaluation of Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
【24h】

Comparison of Sensitivity & Specificity of Transvaginal Sonography, Saline Infusion Sonohysterography and Hysteroscopy in Evaluation of Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

机译:灵敏度比较经阴道超声检查,盐水输注超声宫腔造影和宫腔镜检查在子宫出血异常妇女评估中的特异性

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Bleeding disorders are a common problem in daily practice, especially in premenopausal women. In our investigation, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of three different diagnostic methods Trans-vaginal sonography(TVS), saline infusion sonohystrography(SIS) and Hysteroscopy. Methods: It was a cross- sectional study with a study population of ninety-nine women suffering fromAUB attending the outpatient clinic of Imam and Razi hospital in Ahvaz- Iran. They were evaluated by three different diagnostic methods and the results were compared. This study started from March 2008 to December 2008. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values were measured in TVS, SIS, and finally these two methods were compared with hysteroscopy (as a gold standard). Results: The sensitivity and specificity of TVS was 74.2% and 49.7%, respectively, while that of SIS was 91.6% and 86%, respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value of TVS was 71.9% and 54.3%, respectively, while that of SIS was 85.9% and 85.75%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, the positive predictive and negative predictive values of SIS was more than TVS, and it was similar to hysteroscopy.Conclusion: The findings obtained in the present study indicate that in AUB, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of SIS is more than TVS and therefore can be considered as a first step for diagnosis of AUB.
机译:简介:出血障碍是日常活动中的常见问题,尤其是在绝经前的女性中。在我们的研究中,我们比较了三种不同的诊断方法的敏感性和特异性:经阴道超声检查(TVS),盐水输注超声造影(SIS)和宫腔镜检查。方法:这是一项横断面研究,研究对象是在伊斯坦堡伊玛目和拉齐医院门诊就诊的99名患有AUB的妇女。通过三种不同的诊断方法对它们进行了评估,并对结果进行了比较。这项研究始于2008年3月至2008年12月。在TVS,SIS中测量了敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值,最后将这两种方法与宫腔镜检查(作为金标准)进行了比较。结果:TVS的敏感性和特异性分别为74.2%和49.7%,而SIS的敏感性和特异性分别为91.6%和86%。 TVS的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为71.9%和54.3%,而SIS的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为85.9%和85.75%。 SIS的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测和阴性预测值均高于TVS,与宫腔镜检查相似。结论:本研究结果表明,在AUB中,SIS的敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值SIS不仅是TVS,因此可以视为诊断AUB的第一步。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号