首页> 外文期刊>HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies >Sola Scriptura versus Sola fide versus Solum Imperium? Albert S. Geyser en ? kontemporêre verstaan van μορφ? θεο? in die Christus-himne
【24h】

Sola Scriptura versus Sola fide versus Solum Imperium? Albert S. Geyser en ? kontemporêre verstaan van μορφ? θεο? in die Christus-himne

机译:Sola Scriptura对Sola Fide对Solum Imperium? Albert S. Geyser和?当代对μορφ的理解?什么?在基督的赞美诗中

获取原文
       

摘要

This article explores Albert Stephanus Geyser’s understanding and application of the Christ-hymn (Phlp 2:6–11), focusing especially on the use of the words μορφ? θεο?. The tension between a literary-critical approach to the text ( Scriptura ) versus a dogmatic understanding ( Fide ) is exposed, as well as the challenge of a political ideology of power ( Imperium ). Geyser’s understanding and application are measured in terms of the current state of New Testament exegetical research. In the footsteps of Stendahl and contemporary New Testament scholars, legitimacy is given to a socio-political reading of the text. Geyser is appreciated as a public theologian with a deep consideration for the text as the source for theological and socio-political reflection and practice.
机译:本文探讨了阿尔伯特·斯蒂芬努斯·盖瑟(Albert Stephanus Geyser)对基督赞美诗的理解和应用(弗2:6-11),特别着重于单词μορφ?的使用。 θεο?。揭露了文学批评文本的方式(Scriptura)与教条式的理解(Fide)之间的紧张关系,以及政治权力意识形态的挑战(Imperium)。间歇泉的理解和应用是根据新约训ege研究的现状来衡量的。在斯坦达(Stendahl)和当代新约学者的脚步下,对文本的社会政治解读具有合法性。盖瑟被公认为是一位公共神学家,他对文本作为神学和社会政治反思与实践的渊源进行了深思熟虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号