首页> 外文期刊>HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies >Jesus en geweld: Markus 12:1-12 (en par) en Thomas 65
【24h】

Jesus en geweld: Markus 12:1-12 (en par) en Thomas 65

机译:耶稣与暴力:马可福音12:1-12(和同水准)和托马斯65

获取原文
           

摘要

Jesus and violence: Mark 12:1-12 (and par) and Thomas 65As an advanced agrarian (aristocratic) society, first- century Palestine's social fabric was built on systemic tensions and conflicts between the elite (rulers) and the peasantry (the ruled). At the root of these conflicts were incompatible values (ideologies) and interests. Mediterraneans in general were agonistic (fight-prone) in nature – hence willing to engage in physical conflict at the slightest provocation. Violence in the first-century, however, was more than just physical conflict – it was establishment violence. What was Jesus' stance on violence? An ideological-critical reading of Mark 12:1-12 (and par) indicates that the canonical versions of the Tenants – in which Jesus condones violence – cannot be seen as reflecting the historical Jesus' attitude towards violence. Jesus' stance on violence is rather reflected in GThom 65, in which Jesus is pictured as criticizing all kinds of violence. This study also reiterates the necessity of reading the Biblical text from an ideological-critical perspective to avoid the peril of “gospelizing” Jesus.
机译:耶稣与暴力:马可福音12:1-12(和同等)和托马斯65作为先进的农业(贵族)社会,一世纪巴勒斯坦的社会结构建立在精英(统治者)与农民(统治者)之间的系统性紧张和冲突之上)。这些冲突的根源在于不相容的价值观(意识形态)和利益。一般而言,地中海人在本质上是争斗的(容易发生战斗),因此愿意在丝毫挑衅下进行人身冲突。但是,在第一世纪,暴力不仅仅是肉体上的冲突-而是企业暴力。耶稣对暴力的立场是什么?意识形态上对马可福音12:1-12(和同等学历)的阅读表明,租户的规范版本(耶稣宽恕了暴力)不能被视为反映了耶稣历史上对暴力的态度。耶稣对暴力的立场反映在《 GThom 65》中,其中耶稣被描绘为批评各种暴力。这项研究还重申从意识形态批判的角度阅读圣经文本的必要性,以避免“福音”耶稣的危险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号