...
首页> 外文期刊>Hyle: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry >David Knight & Helge Kragh (eds.): The Making of the Chemist: The Social History of Chemistry in Europe 1789-1914
【24h】

David Knight & Helge Kragh (eds.): The Making of the Chemist: The Social History of Chemistry in Europe 1789-1914

机译:大卫·奈特(David Knight)和赫尔格·克拉格(Helge Kragh)(编):化学家的形成:欧洲化学的社会历史1789-1914

获取原文

摘要

This book is one of the outcomes of a European Science Foundation initiative 'The Evolution of the Chemist, 1789-1939' which comprised a series of work-shops held in Canterbury, Dublin, Del-phi and Frascati. Let me say at the be-ginning that the major strength of the book does lie in its European dimension, particularly in discussing chemistry in some of the 'smaller' countries in Europe about which I certainly learnt a great deal. However, as KNIGHTpoints out in his extended preface (there not being an introduction), some countries are not discussed at length most notably the Netherlands (though briefly mentioned in KRAGH's Afterword), Switzerland and Austria-Hungary (both discussed to a limited extent in HOMBURG's chapter on Germany), none of which receives a chapter or a mention in the index (which could have been fuller), and all of which possessed a strong scientific community during the period. On the other hand, Lithuania, which did not exist during this period, has a chapter to itself
机译:本书是欧洲科学基金会倡议的“化学家的演变,1789-1939年”的成果之一,其中包括在坎特伯雷,都柏林,德尔菲和弗拉斯卡蒂举行的一系列工作坊。首先,我要说的是,这本书的主要优势确实在于它的欧洲范围,特别是在讨论欧洲一些“较小”国家的化学问题时,我当然学到了很多东西。但是,正如KNIGHT在其扩展的序言中所指出(没有引言),对某些国家/地区的讨论最多,尤其是荷兰(尽管在KRAGH的后言中作了简要提及),瑞士和奥地利-匈牙利(都在有限程度上进行了讨论)。洪堡关于德国的一章),在索引中都没有一章或提及(可能会更完整),在此期间,所有这些都拥有强大的科学共同体。另一方面,在此期间不存在的立陶宛本身有一章。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号