...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Resources for Health >Interprofessional teamwork in the trauma setting: a scoping review
【24h】

Interprofessional teamwork in the trauma setting: a scoping review

机译:创伤背景下的跨专业团队合作:范围回顾

获取原文

摘要

Approximately 70 to 80% of healthcare errors are due to poor team communication and understanding. High-risk environments such as the trauma setting (which covers a broad spectrum of departments in acute services) are where the majority of these errors occur. Despite the emphasis on interprofessional collaborative practice and patient safety, interprofessional teamworking in the trauma setting has received little attention. This paper presents the findings of a scoping review designed to identify the extent and nature of this literature in this setting. The MEDLINE (via OVID, using keywords and MeSH in OVID), and PubMed (via NCBI using MeSH), and CINAHL databases were searched from January 2000 to April 2013 for results of interprofessional teamworking in the trauma setting. A hand search was conducted by reviewing the reference lists of relevant articles. In total, 24 published articles were identified for inclusion in the review. Studies could be categorized into three main areas, and within each area were a number of themes: 1) descriptions of the organization of trauma teams (themes included interaction between team members, and leadership); 2) descriptions of team composition and structure (themes included maintaining team stability and core team members); and 3) evaluation of team work interventions (themes included activities in practice and activities in the classroom setting). Descriptive studies highlighted the fluid nature of team processes, the shared mental models, and the need for teamwork and communication. Evaluative studies placed a greater emphasis on specialized roles and individual tasks and activities. This reflects a multiprofessional as opposed to an interprofessional model of teamwork. Some of the characteristics of high-performing interprofessional teams described in this review are also evident in effective teams in the community rehabilitation and intermediate care setting. These characteristics may well be pertinent to other settings, and so provide a useful foundation for future investigations.
机译:大约70%到80%的医疗保健错误是由于团队之间的沟通和理解不力所致。大多数错误发生在高风险环境中,例如创伤环境(覆盖急诊部门的各个部门)。尽管强调跨专业的协作实践和患者安全,但是跨专业团队在创伤方面的团队合作却很少受到关注。本文介绍了范围界定审查的结果,旨在确定这种情况下该文献的范围和性质。检索2000年1月至2013年4月的MEDLINE(通过OVID,在OVID中使用关键字和MeSH)和PubMed(通过NCBI,使用MeSH)和CINAHL数据库,以查找创伤背景下专业人士团队合作的结果。通过查阅相关文章的参考清单进行手工搜索。总共确定了24篇发表的文章以纳入本评价。研究可分为三个主要领域,每个领域内有多个主题:1)对创伤小组组织的描述(主题包括小组成员之间的互动以及领导能力); 2)描述团队组成和结构(主题包括维护团队稳定性和核心团队成员); 3)团队合作干预措施的评估(主题包括实践活动和课堂活动)。描述性研究突出了团队流程的流动性,共享的心理模型以及团队合作和沟通的需求。评估研究更加重视专业角色以及个人任务和活动。这反映了多职业而不是跨职业的团队合作模型。在社区康复和中级照护环境中的有效团队中,此评论中描述的高性能跨专业团队的一些特征也很明显。这些特征很可能与其他设置有关,因此为将来的研究提供了有用的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号