...
首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >Skilful seasonal forecasts of streamflow over Europe?
【24h】

Skilful seasonal forecasts of streamflow over Europe?

机译:欧洲的季节性流量的季节性预报不够熟练?

获取原文

摘要

This paper considers whether there is any added value in using seasonal climate forecasts instead of historical meteorological observations for forecasting streamflow on seasonal timescales over Europe. A Europe-wide analysis of the skill of the newly operational EFAS (European Flood Awareness System) seasonal streamflow forecasts (produced by forcing the Lisflood model with the ECMWF System 4 seasonal climate forecasts), benchmarked against the ensemble streamflow prediction (ESP) forecasting approach (produced by forcing the Lisflood model with historical meteorological observations), is undertaken. The results suggest that, on average, the System 4 seasonal climate forecasts improve the streamflow predictability over historical meteorological observations for the first month of lead time only (in terms of hindcast accuracy, sharpness and overall performance). However, the predictability varies in space and time and is greater in winter and autumn. Parts of Europe additionally exhibit a longer predictability, up to 7 months of lead time, for certain months within a season. In terms of hindcast reliability, the EFAS seasonal streamflow hindcasts are on average less skilful than the ESP for all lead times. The results also highlight the potential usefulness of the EFAS seasonal streamflow forecasts for decision-making (measured in terms of the hindcast discrimination for the lower and upper terciles of the simulated streamflow). Although the ESP is the most potentially useful forecasting approach in Europe, the EFAS seasonal streamflow forecasts appear more potentially useful than the ESP in some regions and for certain seasons, especially in winter for almost 40?% of Europe. Patterns in the EFAS seasonal streamflow hindcast skill are however not mirrored in the System 4 seasonal climate hindcasts, hinting at the need for a better understanding of the link between hydrological and meteorological variables on seasonal timescales, with the aim of improving climate-model-based seasonal streamflow forecasting.
机译:本文考虑了使用季节性气候预测代替历史气象观测来预测欧洲季节性时标流量是否有任何附加价值。欧洲范围内对新运行的EFAS​​(欧洲洪水预警系统)季节性流量预报(通过使用ECMWF System 4季节性Lisflood模型强制实施的季节性气候预报产生)的技巧进行的分析,以整体流量预报(ESP)预报方法​​为基准(通过用历史气象观测值强迫Lisflood模型产生)进行。结果表明,平均而言,系统4的季节气候预报仅在交货时间的前一个月(就后播精度,清晰度和整体性能而言)比历史气象观测指标提高了流量的可预测性。但是,可预测性在时空上有所不同,而在冬季和秋季则更高。欧洲部分地区还表现出更长的可预测性,交货期长达7个月,对于一个季节中的某些月份而言。就后播可靠性而言,EFAS季节性流量后播在所有交付时间上的平均水平要低于ESP。结果还突出了EFAS季节性流量预测对决策的潜在有用性(根据模拟流量的上下边界的后验判别来衡量)。尽管ESP是欧洲最有可能有用的预测方法,但在某些地区和某些季节,尤其是在欧洲近40%的冬季,EFAS季节性流量预测似乎比ESP更有潜力。但是,EFAS季节性流量后预报技能的模式并未反映在系统4的季节性气候后预报中,这提示需要更好地了解季节性时标上的水文和气象变量之间的联系,以期改进基于气候模型的目标。季节性流量预报。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号