首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >Benchmark levels for the consumptive water footprint of crop production for different environmental conditions: a case study for winter wheat in China
【24h】

Benchmark levels for the consumptive water footprint of crop production for different environmental conditions: a case study for winter wheat in China

机译:不同环境条件下作物生产耗水量的基准水平:以中国冬小麦为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Meeting growing food demands while simultaneously shrinking the water footprint (WF) of agricultural production is one of the greatest societal challenges. Benchmarks for the WF of crop production can serve as a reference and be helpful in setting WF reduction targets. The consumptive WF of crops, the consumption of rainwater stored in the soil (green WF), and the consumption of irrigation water (blue WF) over the crop growing period varies spatially and temporally depending on environmental factors like climate and soil. The study explores which environmental factors should be distinguished when determining benchmark levels for the consumptive WF of crops. Hereto we determine benchmark levels for the consumptive WF of winter wheat production in China for all separate years in the period 1961–2008, for rain-fed vs. irrigated croplands, for wet vs. dry years, for warm vs. cold years, for four different soil classes, and for two different climate zones. We simulate consumptive WFs of winter wheat production with the crop water productivity model AquaCrop at a 5 by 5?arcmin resolution, accounting for water stress only. The results show that (i)?benchmark levels determined for individual years for the country as a whole remain within a range of ±20?% around long-term mean levels over 1961–2008, (ii)?the WF benchmarks for irrigated winter wheat are 8–10?% larger than those for rain-fed winter wheat, (iii)?WF benchmarks for wet years are 1–3?% smaller than for dry years, (iv)?WF benchmarks for warm years are 7–8?% smaller than for cold years, (v)?WF benchmarks differ by about 10–12?% across different soil texture classes, and (vi)?WF benchmarks for the humid zone are 26–31?% smaller than for the arid zone, which has relatively higher reference evapotranspiration in general and lower yields in rain-fed fields. We conclude that when determining benchmark levels for the consumptive WF of a crop, it is useful to primarily distinguish between different climate zones. If actual consumptive WFs of winter wheat throughout China were reduced to the benchmark levels set by the best 25?% of Chinese winter wheat production (1224?msup3/sup?tsup?1/sup for arid areas and 841?msup3/sup?tsup?1/sup for humid areas), the water saving in an average year would be 53?% of the current water consumption at winter wheat fields in China. The majority of the yield increase and associated improvement in water productivity can be achieved in southern China.
机译:在满足不断增长的粮食需求的同时,缩小农业生产的水足迹(WF)是最大的社会挑战之一。作物生产自来水基准可以作为参考,并有助于设定减少自来水的目标。作物生长期的消耗性WF,土壤中储存的雨水(绿色WF)和灌溉水(蓝色WF)的消耗随气候和土壤等环境因素而在空间和时间上变化。该研究探讨了在确定农作物消费性WF的基准水平时应区分哪些环境因素。在此,我们确定了1961-2008年间中国所有年份的冬小麦消费性WF基准水平,其中雨养,灌溉农田,湿年与干旱年,暖年与寒冷年,四种不同的土壤类别,以及两种不同的气候带。我们使用作物水分生产率模型AquaCrop以5×5arcmin分辨率模拟冬小麦生产的消耗性WF,仅考虑了水分胁迫。结果表明:(i)整个国家各个年份确定的基准水平在1961-2008年的长期平均水平附近保持在±20%的范围内;(ii)冬季灌溉水的WF基准小麦比雨养冬小麦大8–10%,(iii)湿润年份的WF基准比干燥年份小1-3%,(iv)温暖年份的WF基准为7–比寒冷年份小8%,(v)?WF基准在不同土壤质地类别之间相差约10–12%,(vi)?湿区的WF基准比寒冷年份小26-31?%。干旱区,其总体上具有较高的参考蒸散量,而雨养田中的单产较低。我们得出的结论是,在确定作物的消费性WF的基准水平时,首先区分不同的气候区很有用。如果将全国各地的冬小麦实际消费WFs降至中国冬小麦最高产量的25%(1224?m 3 ?t ?1 对于干旱地区,对于潮湿地区为841?m 3 ?t ?1 ),平均每年节水量为冬季当前用水量的53%中国的麦田。大部分增产和相应的水生产率提高都可以在中国南部实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号