...
首页> 外文期刊>Hospital pediatrics. >Family-Centered Care and Evidence-Based Medicine in Conflict: Lessons for Pediatricians
【24h】

Family-Centered Care and Evidence-Based Medicine in Conflict: Lessons for Pediatricians

机译:冲突中以家庭为中心的护理和循证医学:儿科医生的经验教训

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In contemporary medical education and pediatric practice, “family-centered care” and “evidence-based medicine” (EBM) are frequently promoted simultaneously, as if the 2 are natural partners in the provision of high-quality care. These 2 concepts appear side by side in clinic and hospital mission statements, medical school course aims, and pediatric residency milestones.In fact, the 2 paradigms approach medical practice from radically divergent perspectives. Family-centered care rests on a biopsychosocial model of healing, is fundamentally holistic, and prioritizes the perspectives of patients and families in medical care, whereas EBM is, at its essence, the systematic application of science to practice. For most providers, EBM connotes provision of the highest-quality care based on the available medical science and is intended to minimize unwarranted variation in care that might result in patients receiving therapies that are unsafe, ineffective, costly, or untimely, compared with the gold standards of care derived from scientific evidence and ideally randomized controlled trials, in which “bigger” often means “better.” EBM has gradually supplanted experience-based medicine of decades past, wherein the “experience” is that of the physician. In both evidence- and experience-based systems, the provider is still at the center of the medical encounter.The following case explores several interrelated conflicts during a seemingly routine admission for febrile neutropenia, chiefly between family-centered care and EBM, but which also involved Western biomedicine and alternative healing practices, and social and medical models of disability.A 3-year-old boy with Down syndrome and high-risk pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia presented to our oncology clinic for a transfusion, after routine blood counts. He had been diagnosed 8 months previously and had received chemotherapy with vincristine and PEG-asparaginase 2 days previously. Although he had been feeling well at home, his temperature in clinic rose to 101°F and his absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was 10 cells/ μ L. …
机译:在当代医学教育和儿科实践中,经常同时推广“以家庭为中心的护理”和“循证医学”(EBM),就好像这两个是提供高质量护理的自然伙伴一样。这两个概念在临床和医院使命陈述,医学院课程目标和儿科住院医师里程碑中并排出现。实际上,这两个范例从根本不同的角度来探讨医学实践。以家庭为中心的护理基于康复的生物心理社会模型,从根本上讲是整体的,并在医疗保健中优先考虑患者和家庭的观点,而EBM本质上是将科学应用于实践的系统性方法。对于大多数医疗服务提供者而言,EBM意味着根据现有医学提供最高质量的医疗服务,旨在最大程度地减少不必要的医疗服务差异,与金本位制相比,这种差异可能导致患者接受不安全,无效,昂贵或不及时的治疗护理标准来自科学证据和理想的随机对照试验,其中“更大”通常意味着“更好”。 EBM已逐渐取代了几十年来基于经验的医学,其中“经验”是医师的经验。在基于证据和经验的系统中,提供者仍处于医疗遭遇的中心。以下案例探讨了在看似常规的高热性中性粒细胞减少症住院期间的一些相互关联的冲突,主要是在以家庭为中心的护理和EBM之间,以及涉及西方的生物医学和替代治疗方法,以及残疾的社会和医学模型。一名3岁的唐氏综合症和高危B型急性淋巴细胞白血病的男孩在常规血细胞计数后向我们的肿瘤学诊所输血。他在8个月前被确诊,并在2天前接受了长春新碱和PEG-天冬酰胺酶的化疗。尽管他在家中感觉良好,但他在诊所的温度升至101°F,他的绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)为10细胞/μL。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号