首页> 外文期刊>Hereditas >Sex‐specific recombination rates in Parus major and P. caeruleus, an exception to Huxley's rule
【24h】

Sex‐specific recombination rates in Parus major and P. caeruleus, an exception to Huxley's rule

机译:大特鲁斯犬和青斑假单胞菌的性别特异性重组率是赫x黎法则的一个例外

获取原文
           

摘要

“It appears to be a general rule that wherever crossing-over is absent or markedly reduced in one sex, that sex is the heterogametic sex” (Huxley 1928). However, already six years earlier Haldane (1922) stated in his study on sex-specific differences in recombination frequency in hybrids of animal species “When in the F1 offspring of two different animal races one sex is absent, rare or sterile, that sex is the heterozygous sex”. One explanation for this phenomenon given by Haldane (1922) was close linkage of sex-linked factors due to a greater difficulty of fusion of chromosome pairs in the heterogametic sex. In addition to interspecific processes such as speciation Haldane's rule, therefore, has been also cited in subsequently published literature to explain intraspecific mechanisms such as the interference of recombination in the evolution of sex chromosomes. Accordingly, higher recombination rates in human females than in males, for example, were accepted as being in line with Haldane's rule (Ott 1988; Strachan and Read 1996). However, as long as evolutionary mechanisms are unknown that led Haldane (1922) and Huxley (1928) to put forward their rules, we will follow Dunn and Bennett (1967) and distinguish between two rules: i.e. Haldane's rule for the sex ratio and sterility differences in hybrids, and Huxley's rule for intraspecific differences in recombination rates.There are numerous experimental and theoretical studies aimed at assessing the general validity of Haldane's rule (reviewed by Laurie 1997). Hybridization studies of various insect and bird species provide strong support for Haldane's rule (Coyne 1985, 1992; Wu and Davis 1993, Wu et al. 1996). Beyond this, there is wide compliance with the rule across phylogenetic boundaries and additional examples are given for amphibians (Bull 1983; Rykena 1991) and the nematode Caenorhabditis (Baird et al. 1992). In the context with Haldane's rule, theoretical studies have assessed genetic mechanisms that may be responsible for the postzygotic isolation of species during speciation processes. The recessivity of incompatibilities has been proposed to be the basis for Haldane's rule (Muller 1942). Muller's dominance theory is also strongly supported by mathematical studies (Turelli and Orr 1995, 2000; Orr and Turelli 1996; Turelli and Begun 1997). However, some studies on Drosophila (D. simulans and D. melanogaster) and Lepidoptera species (Heliothis species) yielded data that are incompatible with Haldane's rule. These Drosophila cases are regarded as an exception to Haldane's rule because of cytoplasmatic or maternal zygotic incompatibilities (Sawamura et al. 1993a,b; Sawamura 1996). In interspecific crosses between the Lepidoptera species Heliothis virescens and H. subflexa, a fitness loss of hybrids was found for both sexes; homogametic males were sterile and heterogametic females had only reduced fecundity or fertility (Proshold and LaChance 1974). Regardless of exceptions Haldane's rule requires reproductive isolation during speciation which is enforced by anti-recombinational mechanisms (Forsdyke 1995, 1996).The general validity of Huxley's rule has been discussed as well. Soon after publication of Huxley's rule, some authors noticed exceptions to the rule when studying morphological traits and recombination in birds. Colour inheritance in the domestic pigeon, for example, indicated higher recombination frequencies in females than in males (Hollander 1938). Higher recombination rates in the heterogametic sex were also demonstrated in fowls for several linkage groups (Landauer 1933; Fisher and Landauer 1953). There is a large number of publications discussing the general validity of Huxley's rule in numerous species. Surprisingly, none of those compares recombination processes for the same set of loci in closely related species. Such an approach, however, can provide a more detailed insight in the validity of the rule. Therefore, we tested the linkage between 12 loci in
机译:“似乎普遍的规律是,在任何性别中不存在交叉现象或性别明显减少的地方,该性行为都是异性配子性行为”(Huxley 1928)。然而,早在六年前,霍尔丹(Haldane,1922年)就他在动物物种的杂种中重组频率的性别特异性差异中指出:“在两个不同种族的F1后代中,一种性别不存在,罕见或不育,这种性别是杂合性”。 Haldane(1922)对这种现象的一种解释是,由于异配子性交中染色体对融合的难度更大,因此性相关因素之间的联系紧密。因此,除了种间过程(例如物种形成)外,霍尔丹定律在随后发表的文献中也被引用来解释种内机制,例如重组对性染色体进化的干扰。因此,例如,人类的重组率高于男性的重组率被认为符合霍尔丹定律(Ott 1988; Strachan and Read 1996)。然而,只要不知道导致霍尔丹(1922)和赫x黎(1928)提出其规则的进化机制,我们就将遵循邓恩(Dunn)和贝内特(Bennett)(1967)并区分两个规则:即霍尔丹关于性别比和不育的规则杂种的差异,以及赫ley黎关于种内重组率差异的规则。有许多实验和理论研究旨在评估霍尔丹规则的一般有效性(Laurie 1997综述)。各种昆虫和鸟类物种的杂交研究为霍尔丹定律提供了有力的支持(Coyne 1985,1992; Wu and Davis 1993,Wu et al。1996)。除此之外,在系统发育边界上还广泛遵守该规则,并为两栖动物(Bull 1983; Rykena 1991)和线虫秀丽隐杆线虫(Baird等人1992)提供了更多示例。在霍尔丹定律的背景下,理论研究评估了可能在物种形成过程中导致合子后分离的遗传机制。不兼容的隐性被认为是霍尔丹规则的基础(Muller 1942)。穆勒的统治理论也得到了数学研究的大力支持(Turelli和Orr 1995,2000; Orr和Turelli 1996; Turelli和Begun 1997)。但是,对果蝇(D. simulans和D. melanogaster)和鳞翅目(Heliothis物种)的一些研究得出的数据与霍尔丹定律不符。这些果蝇病例由于胞质或母体的合子不相容性而被认为是霍尔丹法则的一个例外(Sawamura等,1993a,b; Sawamura,1996)。在鳞翅目Heliosthis virescens和H.subflexa种之间的种间杂交中,发现两性杂种的适应性丧失。同性配子的雄性是不育的,异配子的雌性的生殖力或繁殖力降低(Proshold and LaChance 1974)。不管有什么例外,霍尔丹法则都要求在物种形成过程中进行生殖隔离,这是由反重组机制强制执行的(Forsdyke 1995,1996)。还讨论了赫x黎法则的一般有效性。赫x黎规则出版后不久,一些作者在研究鸟类的形态特征和重组时注意到了该规则的例外。例如,家鸽的颜色遗传表明,雌性的重组频率高于雄性(Hollander 1938)。在禽类中,几个连锁群的异配子性重组率也更高(Landauer 1933; Fisher and Landauer 1953)。有大量出版物讨论了赫x黎规则在许多物种中的一般有效性。出乎意料的是,这些都没有一个比较紧密相关物种中同一基因座的重组过程。但是,这种方法可以提供有关规则有效性的更详细的见解。因此,我们测试了12个基因座之间的联系

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号