首页> 外文期刊>Health and Quality of Life Outcomes >Multimorbidity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a nationally representative population sample: implications of count versus cluster method for defining multimorbidity on HRQoL
【24h】

Multimorbidity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a nationally representative population sample: implications of count versus cluster method for defining multimorbidity on HRQoL

机译:全国代表性人群样本中的多发病率和与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL):计数与聚类方法对HRQoL定义多发病率的意义

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundNo universally accepted definition of multimorbidity (MM) exists, and implications of different definitions have not been explored. This study examined the performance of the count and cluster definitions of multimorbidity on the sociodemographic profile and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a general population. MethodsData were derived from the nationally representative 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing ( n =?8841). The HRQoL scores were measured using the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL-4D) instrument. The simple count (2+ & 3+ conditions) and hierarchical cluster methods were used to define/identify clusters of multimorbidity. Linear regression was used to assess the associations between HRQoL and multimorbidity as defined by the different methods. ResultsThe assessment of multimorbidity, which was defined using the count method, resulting in the prevalence of 26% (MM2+) and 10.1% (MM3+). Statistically significant clusters identified through hierarchical cluster analysis included heart or circulatory conditions (CVD)/arthritis (cluster-1, 9%) and major depressive disorder (MDD)/anxiety (cluster-2, 4%). A sensitivity analysis suggested that the stability of the clusters resulted from hierarchical clustering. The sociodemographic profiles were similar between MM2+, MM3+ and cluster-1, but were different from cluster-2. HRQoL was negatively associated with MM2+ (β: ?0.18, SE: ?0.01, p p p p ConclusionsOur findings confirm the existence of an inverse relationship between multimorbidity and HRQoL in the Australian population and indicate that the hierarchical clustering approach is validated when the outcome of interest is HRQoL from this head-to-head comparison. Moreover, a simple count fails to identify if there are specific conditions of interest that are driving poorer HRQoL. Researchers should exercise caution when selecting a definition of multimorbidity because it may significantly influence the study outcomes.
机译:背景技术目前尚无普遍接受的多发病率(MM)定义,并且尚未探讨不同定义的含义。这项研究检查了一般人群中多发病率计数和聚类定义对社会人口统计学特征和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。方法数据来源于全国代表性的2007年澳大利亚国家心理健康与幸福调查(n =?8841)。使用生活质量评估(AQoL-4D)仪器测量HRQoL分数。简单计数(2+和3+条件)和分层聚类方法用于定义/识别多发病的聚类。线性回归用于评估HRQoL与多种方法定义的多发病之间的关联。结果采用计数法定义的多发病率评估,患病率为26%(MM2 +)和10.1%(MM3 +)。通过层次聚类分析确定的统计学上显着的聚类包括心脏或循环系统疾病(CVD)/关节炎(聚类1,9%)和重度抑郁症(MDD)/焦虑症(聚类2,4%)。敏感性分析表明,聚类的稳定性来自分层聚类。 MM2 +,MM3 +和簇1之间的社会人口统计学特征相似,但与簇2不同。 HRQoL与MM2 +呈负相关(β:?0.18,SE:?0.01,pppp)结论我们的发现证实了澳大利亚人群中多发病与HRQoL之间存在反比关系,并表明当感兴趣的结果为HRQoL是通过这种直接的比较而得出的,此外,简单的计数无法确定是否有特定的关注条件正在导致较差的HRQoL,研究人员在选择多发病率定义时应谨慎行事,因为它可能会显着影响研究结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号