首页> 外文期刊>Health >Laboratory Capacity for Surveillance of Infectious Diseases in Gujarat: Quantity, Quality, Effects and Way Forward
【24h】

Laboratory Capacity for Surveillance of Infectious Diseases in Gujarat: Quantity, Quality, Effects and Way Forward

机译:古吉拉特邦传染病监测实验室能力:数量,质量,影响和发展方向

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: India carries one of the largest burdens of infectious diseases in the world. To estimate this, laboratory confirmation is vital. We estimated the lab capacity and effectiveness in the state of Gujarat for Enteric Fever, Infectious Hepatitis, and Dengue. Methods: We estimated the number of labs in the state through telephonic surveys and physical screening of a representative sample of labs. We created four levels of tests, Level-0 being no test and 3 being the best confirmatory test available in the state. For the profusion of rapid diagnostic test kits (RDTKs), we constructed Effective Diagnostic Scores (EDS) calculated from their sensitivity and specificity at disease prevalences specified in the literature. Tests with EDS > 0.51 were level-2 tests, and EDS < 0.50, level-1 tests. Results: Our analysis showed that there are 4293 labs in the state (1765 public and 2528 private), 7/100,000 population. However, only 2878 labs contributed to a total pooled Effective Lab Diagnostic Score (ELDS) of 6776 in the state. Strikingly, 94% of the lab effectiveness lay in RDTs (level-2 and 1 tests) which are essentially screening tests. Ninety-six percent of the overall lab effectiveness of Gujarat existed in private and only 4% in public labs. Contrarily, the level-3 confirmatory testing effectiveness, through ELISA and culture constituted only 4% of private and 36% of public lab effectiveness. More than half of the private lab effectiveness was located in eight Tier 1 cities. Level-3 confirmatory testing effectiveness was present only in Tier 1 and 2 towns. Hepatitis B testing contributed 34% of the total ELDS, followed by Dengue (30%), Enteric Fever (26%) and Hepatitis A and E (10%). Conclusion: Our study has established that the capacity and effectiveness of the lab network in Gujarat lie predominantly in RDTKs. We need to adapt our systems to capture this data in a manner that will allow us to monitor the burdens of these diseases.
机译:背景:印度是世界上最大的传染病负担之一。要估算这一点,实验室确认至关重要。我们估计了古吉拉特邦在肠道热,传染性肝炎和登革热方面的实验室能力和有效性。方法:我们通过电话调查和对代表性实验室样本进行物理筛选,估计了该州的实验室数量。我们创建了四个级别的测试,级别0表示无测试,而级别3表示该州可用的最佳确认测试。为了快速诊断试剂盒(RDTK)的大量使用,我们构建了有效诊断评分(EDS),由它们在文献中指定的疾病流行率下的敏感性和特异性计算得出。 EDS> 0.51的测试为2级测试,EDS <0.50的测试为1级测试。结果:我们的分析表明,该州有4293个实验室(1765个公共实验室和2528个私有实验室),人口为7 / 100,000。但是,该州只有2878个实验室贡献了6776个汇总的有效实验室诊断分数(ELDS)。引人注目的是,94%的实验室效率都来自于RDT(第2级和第1级测试),而这实际上是筛选测试。古吉拉特邦整体实验室效率的百分之九十六存在于私人实验室,只有4%在公共实验室存在。相反,通过ELISA和培养获得的3级验证性测试有效性仅占私人实验室有效性的4%,占公共实验室有效性的36%。私立实验室效率的一半以上位于八个一级城市。 3级确认测试的有效性仅在1级和2级城镇中存在。乙肝测试占总ELDS的34%,其次是登革热(30%),肠热(26%)和甲肝和戊肝(10%)。结论:我们的研究已经确定,古吉拉特邦实验室网络的能力和有效性主要取决于RDTK。我们需要调整我们的系统,以允许我们监视这些疾病的负担的方式来捕获此数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号