首页> 外文期刊>Harm Reduction Journal >A qualitative study of persons who inject drugs but who have never helped others with first injections: how their views on helping contrast with the views of persons who have helped with first injections, and implications for interventions
【24h】

A qualitative study of persons who inject drugs but who have never helped others with first injections: how their views on helping contrast with the views of persons who have helped with first injections, and implications for interventions

机译:对注射药物但从未对他人进行首次注射帮助的人的定性研究:他们对帮助的看法如何与对首次注射帮助的人的看法形成对比,以及对干预措施的意义

获取原文
       

摘要

Transitioning from non-injection to injection drug use dramatically escalates health risks. Evidence suggests that people who inject drugs (PWID) help in a majority of others’ first injections, yet these helpers represent only a minority of experienced PWID. Recent research has provided insight into this helping process, as reported by helpers. PWID who have never helped, although the majority of PWID, have not previously been the focus of study. To address this gap, we give primary voice to non-helpers’ perspectives on the helping process, while also comparing their views with persons in our sample who have helped with first injections. Finally, we consider how non-helpers’ perspectives can inform harm reduction interventions to reduce, or make safer, initiation into injecting drug use. We conducted audio-recorded, qualitative interviews with 23 current opioid injectors on Staten Island, NY, where the opioid epidemic is pronounced. Seventeen had never helped with first injections and 6 had. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and three coders used a consensus-developed codebook to code all interviews. Framework analysis was used to identify overarching themes. We identified three key themes in non-helpers’ discourse around not helping: altruistic motivations to prevent immediate and delayed harms to individuals injecting for the first time; inhibition due to negative assessments of their own injecting skills; and absolutist ethical convictions against helping. Non-helpers differed from helpers on each theme. Because most PWID have never helped with first injections, their perspectives on helping warrant consideration and can inform harm reduction interventions to reduce, or make safer, transitions to injection drug use. Their perspectives can be used to broaden the factors PWID consider around questions of promoting injection and helping with others’ first injections, including considerations of the moral issues involved in choosing to help or not to help.
机译:从非注射毒品过渡到注射毒品使用,极大地加剧了健康风险。证据表明,注射毒品(PWID)的人会在其他大多数人的首次注射中提供帮助,但这些帮助者仅是经验丰富的PWID的一小部分。正如助手所报告的那样,最近的研究提供了对该帮助过程的见解。尽管多数PWID从未帮助过PWID,但以前从未成为研究的重点。为了弥补这一差距,我们主要表达了非帮助者对帮助过程的看法,同时还将他们的观点与我们样本中的首次注射帮助者进行了比较。最后,我们考虑无助者的观点如何为减少伤害干预措施提供信息,以减少或更安全地开始注射毒品的使用。我们在纽约州史坦顿岛对23名阿片类药物目前的注射者进行了录音,定性访谈,在那儿阿片类药物流行很明显。 17人从未帮助过第一次注射,而6人则没有。访谈是逐字记录的,三位编码员使用了共识开发的密码本来编码所有访谈。框架分析用于识别总体主题。我们在非帮助者围绕“不帮助”的论述中确定了三个关键主题:防止首次注射个体受到即时和延迟伤害的利他动机;由于对自己的注射技能的负面评估而受到抑制;以及反对帮助的绝对主义者的道德信念。在每个主题上,非助手与助手有所不同。由于大多数PWID从未帮助过首次注射,因此他们对帮助注射治疗的观点值得考虑,并且可以为减少伤害干预措施提供信息,以减少或更安全地过渡到注射毒品的使用。他们的观点可以用来扩大PWID在促进注射和帮助他人进行首次注射方面的考虑因素,包括对选择帮助或不帮助所涉及的道德问题的考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号