首页> 外文期刊>Health Economics Review >The cost-effectiveness of albumin in the treatment of decompensated cirrhosis in Germany, Italy, and Spain
【24h】

The cost-effectiveness of albumin in the treatment of decompensated cirrhosis in Germany, Italy, and Spain

机译:在德国,意大利和西班牙,白蛋白治疗失代偿性肝硬化的成本效益

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Albumin is frequently prescribed in cirrhotic patients with acute decompensation. However, the true cost effectiveness of albumin use in cirrhotic patients is still under debate. Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of albumin in the treatment of decompensated cirrhosis in Germany, Italy, and Spain. Methods A decision-tree economic model was developed to evaluate treatments for decompensated cirrhosis from the hospital perspective over a typical inpatient admission. The treatments for large volume paracentesis (LVP) were albumin vs saline, gelatin, or no fluid. The treatments for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) were albumin plus antibiotics vs antibiotics alone. The treatments for hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) were albumin plus a vasoconstrictor vs a vasoconstrictor alone. Effectiveness inputs were literature-based. Cost inputs included pharmacy costs and medical complication costs of decompensated cirrhosis. The primary model assessments were incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per life saved and per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Results Albumin was found to be both less costly and more effective relative to saline, gelatin, and no fluid for the treatment of LVP across all 3 countries. For SBP, albumin plus antibiotics was more clinically effective than antibiotics alone in all 3 countries. The combination of albumin plus antibiotics was less costly than antibiotics alone in Germany and Italy, making albumin a dominant treatment (ie, less costly and more effective). In the management of SBP in Spain, albumin plus antibiotics compared to antibiotics alone resulted in ICERs of €1516 per life saved and €3369 per QALY gained. Albumin plus a vasoconstrictor was both less costly and more effective than vasoconstrictor alone in the treatment of HRS across all 3 countries. Conclusion This analysis demonstrates that albumin is cost-effective in terms of lives saved and QALYs gained in the management of decompensated cirrhosis associated with LVP, SBP, or HRS.
机译:背景急性失代偿期肝硬化患者经常开白蛋白。然而,在肝硬化患者中使用白蛋白的真正成本效益仍存在争议。目的评估德国,意大利和西班牙白蛋白治疗失代偿性肝硬化的成本效益。方法建立了决策树经济模型,以从医院角度评估典型住院患者失代偿性肝硬化的治疗方法。大体积穿刺术(LVP)的治疗方法是白蛋白vs生理盐水,明胶或无液体。自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)的治疗方法是白蛋白加抗生素与单独使用抗生素。肝肾综合征(HRS)的治疗方法是白蛋白加血管收缩药vs单独使用血管收缩药。有效性输入是基于文献的。费用输入包括失代偿性肝硬化的药房费用和医疗并发症费用。主要模型评估是每个挽救生命和每个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效益比(ICER)。结果发现在所有三个国家中,与盐水,明胶相比,白蛋白既便宜又有效,并且没有用于治疗LVP的液体。对于SBP,在所有三个国家中,白蛋白加抗生素比单独使用抗生素更有效。在德国和意大利,白蛋白加抗生素的组合比单独使用抗生素便宜,从而使白蛋白成为主要治疗手段(即,成本更低且更有效)。在西班牙的SBP管理中,与单独使用抗生素相比,白蛋白加抗生素可节省每人1516欧元的ICER,每QALY可获得3369欧元。在所有三个国家中,白蛋白加血管收缩剂比单独使用血管收缩剂更便宜,更有效。结论该分析表明,在挽救与LVP,SBP或HRS相关的失代偿性肝硬化中,挽救生命和挽救QALY方面,白蛋白具有成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号