...
首页> 外文期刊>Harm Reduction Journal >Housing First and harm reduction: a rapid review and document analysis of the US and Canadian open-access literature
【24h】

Housing First and harm reduction: a rapid review and document analysis of the US and Canadian open-access literature

机译:住房优先和减少伤害:对美国和加拿大开放获取文献的快速审查和文件分析

获取原文

摘要

Background Housing First is an evidence-based practice intended to serve chronically homeless individuals with co-occurring serious mental illness and substance use disorders. Despite housing active substance users, harm reduction is an often-overlooked element during the Housing First implementation process in real-world settings. In this paper, we explore the representation of the Housing First model within the open-access scholarly literature as a potential contributing factor for this oversight. Methods We conducted a rapid review of the US and Canadian open-access Housing First literature. We followed a document analysis approach, to form an interpretation of the articles’ content related to our primary research questions. Results A total of 55 articles on Housing First were included in the final analysis. Only 21 of these articles (38.1%) included explicit mention of harm reduction. Of the 34 articles that did not discuss harm reduction, 22 provided a description of the Housing First model indicating it does not require abstinence from substance use; however, descriptions did not all clearly indicate abstinence was not required beyond program entry. Additional Housing First descriptions focused on the low-barrier entry criteria and/or the intervention’s client-centeredness. Conclusions Our review demonstrated a lack of both explicit mention and informed discussion of harm reduction in the Housing First literature, which is likely contributing to the Housing First research-practice gap?to some degree. Future Housing First literature should accurately explain the role of harm reduction when discussing it in the context of Housing First programming, and public agencies promoting Housing First uptake should provide resources for proper implementation and monitor program fidelity to prevent model drift.
机译:背景技术“住房第一”是一项循证实践,旨在为患有严重精神疾病和药物滥用双重症的慢性无家可归者提供服务。尽管有使用活性物质的人居住,但在真实环境中“住房优先”实施过程中,减少伤害是一个经常被忽视的因素。在本文中,我们将探讨开放获取学术文献中“住房优先”模型的表示形式,以此作为对此进行监督的潜在因素。方法我们对美国和加拿大的“住房优先开放住房”文献进行了快速回顾。我们采用了文档分析方法,对与我们的主要研究问题相关的文章内容进行了解释。结果最终分析中共有55篇有关“住房第一”的文章。这些文章中只有21篇(占38.1%)明确提及减少伤害。在34篇未讨论减少伤害的文章中,有22篇对“住房优先”模型进行了描述,表明它不需要戒毒。然而,说明并没有全部清楚地表明,除计划参加外,还不需要节制。关于“住房优先”的其他说明着重于低门槛准入标准和/或干预措施以客户为中心。结论我们的审查表明,在“住房优先”文献中既没有明确提及也没有对减少危害进行有见地的讨论,这可能在某种程度上加剧了“住房优先”研究实践的差距。未来的“住房优先”文献应在“住房优先”计划的背景下讨论减害的作用时,应准确地说明减灾的作用,促进“住房优先”采用的公共机构应提供适当实施的资源,并监督计划的真实性以防止模型漂移。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号