...
首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Variations in Substance Use Prevalence Estimates and Need for Interventions Among Adult Emergency Department Patients Based on Different Screening Strategies Using the ASSIST
【24h】

Variations in Substance Use Prevalence Estimates and Need for Interventions Among Adult Emergency Department Patients Based on Different Screening Strategies Using the ASSIST

机译:基于使用ASSIST的不同筛查策略,成人急诊科患者的药物使用流行度估计值和干预需求的差异

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Introduction: Among adult emergency department (ED) patients, we sought to examine how estimates of substance use prevalence and the need for interventions can differ, based on the type of screening and assessment strategies employed. Methods: We estimated the prevalence of substance use and the need for interventions using the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) in a secondary analysis of data from two cross-sectional studies using random samples of English- or Spanish-speaking 18-64-year-old ED patients. In addition, the test performance characteristics of three simplified screening strategies consisting of selected questions from the ASSIST (lifetime use, past three-month use, and past three-month frequency of use) to identify patients in need of a possible intervention were compared against using the full ASSIST. Results: Of 6,432 adult ED patients, the median age was 37 years-old, 56.6% were female, and 61.6% were white. Estimated substance use prevalence among this population differed by how it was measured (lifetime use, past three-month use, past three-month frequency of use, or need for interventions). As compared to using the full ASSIST, the predictive value and accuracy to identify patients in need of any intervention was best for a simplified strategy asking about past three-month substance use. A strategy asking about dailyear-daily use was better in identifying patients needing intensive interventions. However, some patients needing interventions were missed when using these simplified strategies. Conclusion: Substance use prevalence estimates and identification of ED patients needing interventions differ by screening strategies used. EDs should carefully select strategies to identify patients in need of substance use interventions.
机译:简介:在成年急诊科(ED)的患者中,我们试图根据所采用的筛查和评估策略的类型,检查对物质使用流行程度的估计与干预措施的需求之间的差异。方法:我们使用酒精,吸烟和物质参与筛查测试(ASSIST),对使用英语或西班牙语的随机样本进行的两项横断面研究数据的二次分析中,估计了酒精使用的普遍性和进行干预的必要性18 -64岁的ED患者。此外,比较了三种简化筛查策略的测试性能特征,这些策略包括ASSIST选定的问题(终生使用,过去三个月使用和过去三个月使用频率),以识别需要干预的患者使用完整的ASSIST。结果:在6,432名成人ED患者中,中位年龄为37岁,女性为56.6%,白人为61.6%。该人群中估计的物质使用流行率因其测量方式而异(生命周期使用,过去三个月的使用,过去三个月的使用频率或需要干预)。与使用完整的ASSIST相比,对于需要询问过去三个月药物使用情况的简化策略而言,确定需要任何干预的患者的预测价值和准确性最佳。询问每天/每天使用的策略可以更好地识别需要强化干预的患者。但是,使用这些简化策略时,错过了一些需要干预的患者。结论:根据所采用的筛查策略,药物使用流行率的估计和需要干预的ED患者的识别有所不同。急诊部应仔细选择策略,以识别需要药物滥用干预的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号