...
首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Routine Repeat Head CT may not be Indicated in Patients on Anticoagulant/Antiplatelet Therapy Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
【24h】

Routine Repeat Head CT may not be Indicated in Patients on Anticoagulant/Antiplatelet Therapy Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

机译:轻度脑外伤后抗凝/抗血小板治疗的患者可能无法常规重复行头部CT检查

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: Evaluation recommendations for patients on anticoagulant and antiplatelet (ACAP) therapy that present after mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) are controversial. At our institution, an initial noncontrast head computed tomography (HCT) is performed, with a subsequent HCT performed six hours later to exclude delayed intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). This study was performed to evaluate the yield and advisability of this approach. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of subjects undergoing evaluation for ICH after mild TBI in patients on ACAP therapy between January of 2012 and April of 2013. We assessed for the frequency of ICH on both the initial noncontrast HCT and on the routine six-hour follow-up HCT. Additionally, chart review was performed to evaluate the clinical implications of ICH, when present, and to interrogate whether pertinent clinical and laboratory data may predict the presence of ICH prior to imaging. We used multivariate generalized linear models to assess whether presenting Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), loss of consciousness (LOC), neurological or physical examination findings, international normalized ratio, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, platelet count, or specific ACAP regimen predicted ICH. Results: 144 patients satisfied inclusion criteria. Ten patients demonstrated initial HCT positive for ICH, with only one demonstrating delayed ICH on the six-hour follow-up HCT. This patient was discharged without any intervention required or functional impairment. Presenting GCS deviation (p<0.001), LOC (p=0.04), neurological examination findings (p<0.001), clopidogrel (p=0.003), aspirin (p=0.03) or combination regimen (p=0.004) use were more commonly seen in patients with ICH. Conclusion: Routine six-hour follow-up HCT is likely not indicated in patients on ACAP therapy, as our study suggests clinically significant delayed ICH does not occur. Additionally, presenting GCS deviation, LOC, neurological examination findings, clopidogrel, aspirin or combination regimen use may predict ICH, and, in the absence of these findings, HCT may potentially be forgone altogether. [West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(1):-0.].
机译:简介:对于轻度脑外伤(TBI)后出现的抗凝和抗血小板(ACAP)治疗患者的评估建议存在争议。在我们的机构中​​,首先进行了非对比头计算机体层摄影(HCT),随后的六小时后进行了HCT,以排除延迟性颅内出血(ICH)。进行这项研究以评估这种方法的产率和可取性。方法:我们对2012年1月至2013年4月间接受ACAP治疗的患者在轻度TBI后接受ICH评估的受试者进行了回顾性研究。我们评估了初始非对比HCT和常规6小时ICH的频率后续HCT。此外,还进行了图表审查以评估ICH的临床意义(如果存在),并询问相关的临床和实验室数据是否可以在成像前预测ICH的存在。我们使用多变量广义线性模型评估是否存在格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS),意识丧失(LOC),神经或体格检查结果,国际标准化比率,凝血酶原时间,部分凝血活酶时间,血小板计数或特定的ACAP方案预测的ICH 。结果:144例患者符合纳入标准。 10名患者表现出ICH的初始HCT阳性,只有1名患者在6小时的随访HCT中显示出ICH延迟。该患者出院时无需任何干预或功能受损。表现为GCS偏差(p <0.001),LOC(p = 0.04),神经系统检查结果(p <0.001),氯吡格雷(p = 0.003),阿司匹林(p = 0.03)或联合治疗(p = 0.004)更常见在ICH患者中可见。结论:接受ACAP治疗的患者可能无法进行常规的6小时HCT随访,因为我们的研究表明,临床上不会出现明显的延迟性ICH。此外,如果出现GCS偏差,LOC,神经系统检查发现,氯吡格雷,阿司匹林或联合用药方案可能预示着ICH,并且在没有这些发现的情况下,可能完全放弃了HCT。 [西急救医学杂志。 2015; 16(1):-0。]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号