首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Acute Stroke: Current Evidence-based Recommendations for Prehospital Care
【24h】

Acute Stroke: Current Evidence-based Recommendations for Prehospital Care

机译:急性中风:目前基于证据的院前护理建议

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction: In the United States, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) protocols vary widely across jurisdictions. We sought to develop evidence-based recommendations for the prehospital evaluation and treatment of a patient with a suspected stroke and to compare these recommendations against the current protocols utilized by the 33 EMS agencies in the State of California. Methods: We performed a literature review of the current evidence in the prehospital treatment of a patient with a suspected stroke and augmented this review with guidelines from various national and international societies to create our evidence-based recommendations. We then compared the stroke protocols of each of the 33 EMS agencies for consistency with these recommendations. The specific protocol components that we analyzed were the use of a stroke scale, blood glucose evaluation, use of supplemental oxygen, patient positioning, 12 lead ECG and cardiac monitoring, fluid assessment and intravenous access, and stroke regionalization. Results: Protocols across EMS agencies in California varied widely. Most used some sort of stroke scale with the majority using the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS). All recommended the evaluation of blood glucose with the level for action ranging from 60 to 80mg/dL. Cardiac monitoring was recommended in 58% and 33% recommended an ECG. More than half required the direct transport to a primary stroke center and 88% recommended hospital notification. Conclusion: Protocols for a patient with a suspected stroke vary widely across the State of California. The evidence-based recommendations that we present for the prehospital diagnosis and treatment of this condition may be useful for EMS medical directors tasked with creating and revising these protocols.
机译:简介:在美国,紧急医疗服务(EMS)协议在各个辖区之间差异很大。我们试图为循证推荐的可疑中风患者的院前评估和治疗提供建议,并将这些建议与加利福尼亚州33个EMS机构采用的当前方案进行比较。方法:我们对可疑中风患者的院前治疗中的现有证据进行了文献综述,并用来自各个国家和国际社会的指南对该综述进行了补充,以建立我们基于证据的建议。然后,我们比较了33个EMS机构中每个机构的中风方案,以确保与这些建议相一致。我们分析的特定方案组成部分包括卒中量表的使用,血糖评估,补充氧气的使用,患者定位,12导联心电图和心脏监测,体液评估和静脉通路以及中风区域划分。结果:加利福尼亚州EMS机构之间的协议差异很大。大多数使用某种中风量表,大多数使用辛辛那提院前中风量表(CPSS)。所有人都建议对血糖进行评估,其作用水平为60至80mg / dL。 58%的人建议进行心脏监护,心电图的建议者为33%。超过一半需要直接运输到中风中心,建议88%的医院通知医院。结论:在加利福尼亚州,疑似中风患者的治疗方案差异很大。我们为院前诊断和治疗此病提出的循证建议可能对负责创建和修改这些方案的EMS医疗总监有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号