...
首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Management of Pediatric Skin Abscesses in Pediatric, General Academic and Community Emergency Departments
【24h】

Management of Pediatric Skin Abscesses in Pediatric, General Academic and Community Emergency Departments

机译:儿科,普通学术和社区急诊科的小儿皮肤脓肿的管理

获取原文

摘要

Objectives: To compare the evaluation and management of pediatric cutaneous abscess patients at three different emergency department (ED) settings. Method: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at two academic pediatric hospital EDs, a general academic ED and a community ED in 2007, with random sampling of 100 patients at the three academic EDs and inclusion of 92 patients from the community ED. Eligible patients were ≤18 years who had a cutaneous abscess. We recorded demographics, predisposing conditions, physical exam findings, incision and drainage procedures, therapeutics and final disposition. Laboratory data were reviewed for culture results and antimicrobial sensitivities. For subjects managed as outpatients from the ED, we determined where patients were instructed to follow up and, using electronic medical records, ascertained the proportion of patients who returned to the ED for further management. Result: Of 392 subjects, 59% were female and the median age was 7.7 years. Children at academic sites had larger abscesses compared to community patients, (3.5 versus 2.5 cm, p=0.02). Abscess incision and drainage occurred in 225 (57%) children, with the lowest rate at the academic pediatric hospital EDs (51%) despite the relatively larger abscess size. Procedural sedation and the collection of wound cultures were more frequent at the academic pediatric hospital and the general academic EDs. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence did not differ among sites; however, practitioners at the academic pediatric hospital EDs (92%) and the general academic ED (86%) were more likely to initiate empiric MRSA antibiotic therapy than the community site (71%), (p<0.0001). At discharge, children who received care at the community ED were more likely to be given a prescription for a narcotic (23%) and told to return to the ED for ongoing wound care (65%). Of all sites, the community ED also had the highest percentage of follow-up visits (37%). Conclusion: Abscess management varied among the three settings, with more conservative antibiotic selection and greater implementation of procedural sedation at academic centers and higher prescription rates for narcotics, self-referrals for ongoing care and patient follow-up visits at the community ED. [West J Emerg Med. 2011;12(2):159-167.].
机译:目的:比较三种不同急诊科(ED)设置的小儿皮肤脓肿患者的评估和治疗。方法:2007年,我们在两个学术儿科医院急诊室,一个普通学术急诊室和一个社区急诊室进行了一项回顾性队列研究,从三个学术急诊室随机抽取了100名患者,其中包括来自社区急诊室的92例患者。符合条件的患者≤18岁,有皮肤脓肿。我们记录了人口统计学,易感性疾病,体格检查结果,切开和引流程序,治疗方法和最终处置情况。审查了实验室数据的培养结果和抗菌敏感性。对于急诊科门诊患者,我们确定了指导患者随访的地方,并使用电子病历确定了返回急诊科进一步治疗的患者比例。结果:在392名受试者中,女性占59%,中位年龄为7.7岁。与社区患者相比,学术场所的孩子脓肿更大(3.5对2.5 cm,p = 0.02)。脓肿切开引流发生在225名(57%)儿童中,尽管脓肿相对较大,但在儿科医院急诊室的比率最低(51%)。在儿科学术医院和普通急诊科,程序性镇静和伤口文化的收集更为频繁。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的患病率在各部位之间没有差异。然而,与社区站点(71%)相比,学术儿科医院急诊医师(92%)和普通学术急诊医师(86%)更可能开始经验性MRSA抗生素治疗(p <0.0001)。在出院时,在社区急诊室接受治疗的儿童更有可能获得麻醉药处方(23%),并被告知返回急诊室进行伤口护理(65%)。在所有站点中,社区ED的随访率也最高(37%)。结论:三种情况下脓肿的处理情况有所不同,在学术中心使用更保守的抗生素选择和程序性镇静措施的实施以及麻醉药的处方率更高,在社区急诊中自我推荐和持续随访以及患者在社区急诊就诊。 [西急救医学杂志。 2011; 12(2):159-167。]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号