首页> 外文期刊>Water >Economic Feasibility of Irrigated Agricultural Land Use Buffers to Reduce Groundwater Nitrate in Rural Drinking Water Sources
【24h】

Economic Feasibility of Irrigated Agricultural Land Use Buffers to Reduce Groundwater Nitrate in Rural Drinking Water Sources

机译:灌溉农业土地利用缓冲带降低农村饮用水源中地下水硝态氮的经济可行性

获取原文
           

摘要

Agricultural irrigation leachate is often the largest source for aquifer recharge in semi-arid groundwater basins, but contamination from fertilizers and other agro-chemicals may degrade the quality of groundwater. Affected communities are frequently economically disadvantaged, and water supply alternatives may be too costly. This study aimed to demonstrate that, when addressing these issues, environmental sustainability and market profitability are not incompatible. We investigated the viability of two low impact crops, alfalfa and vineyards, and new recharge basins as an alternative land use in recharge buffer zones around affected communities using an integrated hydrologic, socio-geographic, and economic analysis. In the southern Central Valley, California, study area, alfalfa and vineyards currently constitute 30% of all buffer zone cropland. Economic analyses of alternative land use scenarios indicate a wide range of revenue outcomes. Sector output gains and potential cost saving through land use conversion and resulting flood control result in gains of at least $2.3 billion, as compared to costs of $0.3 to $0.7 billion for treatment options over a 20 year period. Buffer zones would maintain the economic integrity of the region and concur with prevailing policy options. Thus, managed agricultural recharge buffer zones are a potentially attractive option for communities facing financial constraint and needing to diversify their portfolio of policy and infrastructure approaches to meet drinking water quality objectives.
机译:农业灌溉渗滤液通常是半干旱地下水盆地中含水层补给的最大来源,但是化肥和其他农药的污染可能会降低地下水的质量。受影响的社区通常在经济上处于不利地位,替代供水的成本可能太高。这项研究旨在证明,在解决这些问题时,环境可持续性和市场盈利能力是不相容的。我们使用综合的水文,社会地理和经济分析,调查了两种低影响作物,苜蓿和葡萄园以及新的补给盆地作为受影响社区周围补给缓冲区的替代土地利用的可行性。在加利福尼亚州中央山谷南部,研究区,苜蓿和葡萄园目前占所有缓冲区耕地的30%。可供选择的土地使用方案的经济分析表明,收入的范围很广。通过土地利用转换和防洪措施,部门的产出收益和潜在的成本节省带来的收益至少为23亿美元,而20年来治疗方案的成本为0.3到7亿美元。缓冲区将保持该地区的经济完整性,并同意现行的政策选择。因此,有管理的农业补给缓冲区对于面临财政困难并需要多样化其政策和基础设施方法组合以达到饮用水水质目标的社区来说,可能是一个有吸引力的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号