首页> 外文期刊>Water >A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis System for Prioritizing Sites and Types of Low Impact Development Practices: Case of Korea
【24h】

A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis System for Prioritizing Sites and Types of Low Impact Development Practices: Case of Korea

机译:优先考虑低影响力开发实践的地点和类型的多标准决策分析系统:韩国的案例

获取原文
           

摘要

This study developed a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework to prioritize sites and types of low impact development (LID) practices. This framework was systemized as a web-based system coupled with the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM). Using TOPSIS method, which is a type of MCDA method, multiple types and sites of designated LID practices are prioritized. This system is named the Water Management Prioritization Module (WMPM). WMPM can simultaneously determine the priority of multiple LID types and sites. In this study, an infiltration trench and permeable pavement were considered for multiple sub-catchments in South Korea to demonstrate the WMPM procedures. The TOPSIS method was manually incorporated to select the vulnerable target sub-catchments and to prioritize the LID planning scenarios for multiple types and sites considering social, hydrologic and physical-geometric factors. In this application, the Delphi method and entropy theory were used to determine the subjective and objective weights, respectively.
机译:这项研究开发了多标准决策分析(MCDA)框架,以优先考虑低影响力开发(LID)实践的地点和类型。该框架被系统化为一个基于Web的系统,并结合了雨水管理模型(SWMM)。使用TOPSIS方法(一种MCDA方法),可以对指定LID做法的多种类型和位置进行优先排序。该系统被称为水管理优先排序模块(WMPM)。 WMPM可以同时确定多个LID类型和站点的优先级。在这项研究中,考虑在韩国的多个子集水区使用渗透沟和渗透性路面来证明WMPM程序。 TOPSIS方法已被手动合并,以选择易受攻击的目标子汇水区,并考虑社会,水文和自然地理因素,为多种类型和场所确定LID规划方案的优先级。在本申请中,分别使用Delphi方法和熵理论确定主观权重和客观权重。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号