首页> 外文期刊>Water >The Rocky Path to Source Water Protection: A Cross-Case Analysis of Drinking Water Crises in Small Communities in Canada
【24h】

The Rocky Path to Source Water Protection: A Cross-Case Analysis of Drinking Water Crises in Small Communities in Canada

机译:通往水源保护的坎Path之路:加拿大小社区饮用水危机的跨案例分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Source water protection (SWP) is increasingly seen as effective in reducing the incidence and extent of drinking water crises, yet its facilitation requires certain measures. Canada has one of the most decentralized water governance systems in the world. We sought to understand the experience and impacts of drinking water crises at community and government levels in a decentralized context: the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador through cross-case analysis. We selected our three study communities through a database of media reports in 2014 followed by invitations to community leaders. We used descriptive and qualitative methods, specifically structured interview schedules with both closed- and open-ended questions, and interviewed four community leaders and three provincial government officials. We used NVivo in data analysis, especially in the identification of themes. While government officials defined water crises largely in terms of SWP, this was not the same for communities, whose concern was mainly water access, specifically water shortages. Thus, while the prioritizing of SWP can be useful, the current focus on SWP has the potential to overlook aspects of water security, particularly in some rural and Indigenous communities in Canada. If we envision water security as a ladder representing a hierarchy of needs, some communities are too far down on the ladder to operationalize SWP because their water problems are more extreme.
机译:人们越来越多地认为水源保护(SWP)在减少饮用水危机的发生率和程度方面有效,但其便利化需要采取某些措施。加拿大拥有世界上最分散的水治理系统之一。我们试图通过跨案例分析来了解分散化背景下的社区和政府饮用水危机的经验和影响:加拿大纽芬兰省和拉布拉多省。我们通过2014年的媒体报道数据库选择了我们的三个研究社区,然后邀请了社区领导人。我们使用了描述性和定性的方法,特别是结构化的访谈时间表,包括不限成员名额和不限成员名额的问题,并采访了四名社区领导人和三名省政府官员。我们将NVivo用于数据分析,尤其是在主题识别中。尽管政府官员主要根据SWP来定义水危机,但对于社区而言却并非如此,他们所关注的主要是水的获取,特别是水的短缺。因此,尽管优先考虑SWP是有用的,但当前对SWP的关注可能会忽视水安全的各个方面,特别是在加拿大的某些农村和土著社区。如果我们将水安全设想为代表需求层次的阶梯,那么某些社区就无法实现SWP,因为他们的水问题更加极端。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号