首页> 外文期刊>Veterinary Sciences >The Performance of Three Immune Assays to Assess the Serological Status of Cattle Experimentally Exposed to Mycoplasma bovis
【24h】

The Performance of Three Immune Assays to Assess the Serological Status of Cattle Experimentally Exposed to Mycoplasma bovis

机译:三种免疫测定法评估牛实验性牛支原体血清学状况的性能

获取原文
       

摘要

Mycoplasma bovis is associated with several clinical syndromes of cattle. Currently, limited information is available on the sensitivity ( Se ) and specificity ( Sp ) of serological assays used for the detection of M. bovis -specific antibodies. Consequently, it is difficult to critically evaluate the outcomes of studies that use these assays. Therefore, the current study used bovine sera sourced from M. bovis exposure studies from three countries to estimate the Se and Sp of two commercial M. bovis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), BIO K302 and BIO K260, and Western blotting. Western blotting had the highest Se estimate of 74% (95% confidence interval (CI): 16–98%), compared to the BIO K302: 47% (95% CI: 10–87%) and BIO K260: 28% (95% CI: 1–92%). However, for Sp, the BIO K302: 96% (95% CI: 87–99%) and the BIO K260: 100% (95% CI: 93–100%) out-performed Western blotting: 88% (95% CI: 56–98%). Western blotting was the best assay for detecting seroconversion, correctly identifying 61% (95% CI: 29–86%) of exposed animals compared to 35% for BIO K302 (95% CI: 21–54%) and 8% for BIO K260 (95% CI: 0–87%). While none of the methods assessed had high Se and Sp , the availability of these estimates will aid in the interpretation of studies that use these assays. The results of this study highlight the difficulties encountered when using serology to detect exposure to M. bovis in cattle.
机译:牛支原体与牛的几种临床综合征有关。目前,关于用于检测牛分枝杆菌特异性抗体的血清学测定法的灵敏度(Se)和特异性(Sp)的信息有限。因此,很难严格评估使用这些测定法的研究结果。因此,本研究使用了来自三个国家的牛分枝杆菌暴露研究获得的牛血清,以估算两种商业化的牛分枝杆菌酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),BIO K302和BIO K260以及蛋白质印迹法的Se和Sp。蛋白质印迹法对硒的最高估计值为74%(95%置信区间(CI):16–98%),而BIO K302:47%(95%CI:10–87%)和BIO K260:28%( 95%CI:1-92%)。但是,对于Sp,BIO K302:96%(95%CI:87–99%)和BIO K260:100%(95%CI:93–100%)优于Western印迹:88%(95%CI) :56–98%)。 Western blotting是检测血清转化的最佳方法,可以正确识别出61%(95%CI:29–86%)的暴露动物,而BIO K302为35%(95%CI:21–54%)和BIO K260为8% (95%CI:0–87%)。尽管所评估的方法均没有较高的Se和Sp值,但这些估计值的可用性将有助于解释使用这些测定法的研究。这项研究的结果突出了使用血清学检测牛中牛分枝杆菌暴露时遇到的困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号