...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Poor uptake of an online intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial of online diabetes education for rural general practitioners
【24h】

Poor uptake of an online intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial of online diabetes education for rural general practitioners

机译:对农村全科医生进行在线糖尿病教育的一项随机研究的随机对照试验中,在线干预的摄取率低

获取原文
           

摘要

Background In Australia, rural and remote communities have high rates of diabetes-related death and hospitalisation. General practitioners (GPs) play a major role in diabetes detection and management. Education of GPs could optimise diabetes management and improve patient outcomes at a population level. The study aimed to describe the uptake of a continuing medical education intervention for rural GPs and its impact on the viability of a cluster randomised controlled trial of the effects of continuing medical education on whole-town diabetes monitoring and control. Method Trial design: the cluster randomised controlled trial involved towns as the unit of allocation and analysis with outcomes assessed by de-identified pathology data (not reported here). The intervention programme consisted of an online active learning module, direct electronic access to specialist advice and performance feedback. Multiple rounds of invitation were used to engage GPs with the online intervention content. Evidence-based strategies (e.g. pre-notification, rewards, incentives) were incorporated into the invitations to enrol in the programme. Recruitment to the programme was electronically monitored through the hosting software package during the study intervention period. Results Eleven matched pairs of towns were included in the study. There were 146 GPs in the 11 intervention towns, of whom 34 (23.3%) enrolled in the programme, and 8 (5.5%) completed the online learning module. No town had more than 10% of the resident GPs complete the learning module. There were no contacts made by GPs regarding requests for specialist advice. Consequently, the trial was discontinued. Conclusion There is an ongoing need to engage primary care physicians in improving diabetes monitoring and management in rural areas. Online training options, while notionally attractive and accessible, are not likely to have high levels of uptake, even when evidence-based recruitment strategies are implemented. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, identifier: ACTRN12611000553976 . Retrospectively registered on 31 May 2011.
机译:背景技术在澳大利亚,农村和偏远社区的糖尿病相关死亡和住院率很高。全科医生(GPs)在糖尿病的检测和管理中起主要作用。对全科医生的教育可以优化糖尿病的管理,并从总体上改善患者的预后。这项研究旨在描述对农村全科医生的继续医学教育干预措施的采用及其对继续医学教育对全镇糖尿病监测和控制的影响的一项随机分组对照试验的可行性的影响。方法试验设计:整群随机对照试验涉及城镇作为分配和分析的单位,其结果由不确定的病理数据评估(此处未报告)。干预计划包括在线主动学习模块,直接通过电子途径获得专家建议和绩效反馈。多轮邀请被用于使GP参与在线干预内容。以证据为基础的策略(例如预先通知,奖励,激励措施)已被纳入邀请参加该计划的邀请中。在研究干预期间,通过托管软件包以电子方式监控该计划的招募。结果研究中包括11对匹配的城镇。 11个干预镇有146个GP,其中34个(23.3%)参加了该计划,其中8个(5.5%)完成了在线学习模块。没有哪个镇有超过10%的居民GP完成学习模块。全科医生没有就专家建议的请求进行任何联系。因此,该审判被中止。结论持续需要让初级保健医生来改善农村地区的糖尿病监测和管理。在线培训选项虽然具有吸引力并易于使用,但即使实施了循证招聘策略,也不太可能获得很高的接受率。试验注册澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心,标识符:ACTRN12611000553976。追溯注册于2011年5月31日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号