...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >A cohort examination to establish reporting of the remit and function of Trial Steering Committees in randomised controlled trials
【24h】

A cohort examination to establish reporting of the remit and function of Trial Steering Committees in randomised controlled trials

机译:一项队列检查,以建立有关随机对照试验中临床指导委员会的职权范围和职能的报告

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The DAMOCLES project established a widely used Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) Charter for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Typically, within the UK, the DMC is advisory and recommends to another executive body; the Trial Steering Committee (TSC). Despite the executive role of the TSC, the CONSORT Statement does not explicitly require reporting of TSC activity, although is included as an example of good reporting. A lack of guidance on TSC reporting can impact transparency of trial oversight, ultimately leading to a misunderstanding regarding role and, subsequently, further variation in practice. This review aimed to establish reporting practice of TSC involvement in RCTs, and thus make recommendations for reporting. A cohort examination identifying reporting practice was undertaken. The cohort comprised RCTs published in three leading medical journals (the British Medical Journal, The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine) within 6?months in 2012 and the full NIHR HTA Monograph series. Details of TSC constitution and impact were extracted from main publications and published supplements. Of 415 publications, 264 were eligible. These were typical in terms of trial design. Variations in reporting between journals and monographs was notable. TSC presence was identified in approximately half of trials (n?=?144), of which 109 worked alongside a DMC. No publications justified not convening a TSC. When reported, the role of the committee and examples of impact in design, conduct and analysis were summarised. We present the first review of reporting TSC activity in the published academic literature. An absence of reporting standards with regards to TSC constitution, activity and impact on trial conduct was identified which can influence transparency of reporting trial oversight. Consistent reporting is vital for the benefits and impact of the TSC role to be understood to support adoption of this oversight structure and reduce global variations in practice.
机译:DAMOCLES项目为随机对照试验(RCT)建立了广泛使用的数据监控委员会(DMC)章程。通常,在英国境内,DMC是咨询机构,并推荐给其他执行机构。审判指导委员会(TSC)。尽管有TSC的执行职责,但是CONSORT声明并未明确要求报告TSC的活动,尽管它是良好报告的示例。缺乏有关TSC报告的指导会影响审判监督的透明度,最终导致对角色的误解,进而导致实践上的进一步变化。这项审查旨在建立TSC参与RCT的报告实践,从而提出报告建议。进行了队列研究,以确定报告的做法。该队列包括2012年6个月内在三大医学杂志(《英国医学杂志》,《柳叶刀》和《新英格兰医学杂志》上发表的RCT)和完整的NIHR HTA专着系列。 TSC构成和影响的详细信息摘自主要出版物和已出版的补编。在415种出版物中,有264种符合条件。这些是试验设计的典型代表。期刊和专着之间的报告差异显着。在大约一半的试验中发现了TSC的存在(n = 144),其中109个与DMC一起使用。没有任何出版物证明不召开TSC。报告时,总结了委员会的作用以及在设计,行为和分析中的影响示例。我们在已发表的学术文献中首次报告报告TSC活动。查明缺乏关于TSC构成,活动和对审判行为的影响的报告标准,这可能会影响报告审判监督的透明度。一致的报告对于TSC角色的好处和影响至关重要,这一点应理解为支持采用这种监督结构并减少实践中的全球差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号