...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >A comparison of intervention and conservative treatment for angulated fractures of the distal forearm in children (AFIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

A comparison of intervention and conservative treatment for angulated fractures of the distal forearm in children (AFIC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:儿童前臂远端弯曲骨折的介入治疗与保守治疗的比较(AFIC):一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文

摘要

Background Angulated fractures of the distal forearm are very frequent lesions in childhood. Currently, there are no standard guidelines on whether these children should be treated conservatively with a cast; with reduction and a cast; or with reduction, pinning and a cast under anesthesia. Minor prospective and retrospective studies have shown that the distal physis of the forearm possesses high remodeling capacity leading to reliable correction of malalignment. The aim of this trial is to answer the question about whether operative and conservative treatment show equivocal results. Methods/Design This is a prospective, multinational, multicenter, randomized, observer-blinded, actively controlled, parallel group trial, with 24?months of observation. The primary objective of this trial is to assess whether or not the long-term functional outcome in remodeling patients is inferior to patients receiving closed reduction and K-wire pinning. The trial should include 742 patients with acute fracture. The patients will be included in 30 medical centers in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. All patients 5 to 11?years of age presenting at the emergency department with an angulated distal fracture of the forearm will be randomized online after informed consent. The primary endpoint is the Cooney Score after 24?months. The secondary endpoint is the grade of radiological displacement at 12/24?months. Discussion Therapy of angulated fractures is a matter of intensive debate. Primary manipulation and pinning under general anesthesia is recommended in order to avoid malalignment. No major study has proven the advantage of manipulation and pinning over immobilization alone. Should remodeling appear to be a safe alternative, manipulation under general anesthesia, K-wire pinning and removal of pins could be avoided, thus sparing significant costs. Trial registration DRKS00004874 , 30 October 2013.
机译:背景技术前臂远端成角度的骨折在儿童期非常常见。目前,对于这些孩子是否应该保守地使用石膏进行治疗还没有标准的指南。减少和施法;或在麻醉下进行复位,固定和石膏固定。较小的前瞻性和回顾性研究表明,前臂的远端实体具有很高的重塑能力,可对畸形进行可靠的矫正。该试验的目的是回答关于手术和保守治疗是否显示出模棱两可的结果的问题。方法/设计这是一项前瞻性,多国,多中心,随机,观察者盲目,主动控制的平行分组试验,观察24个月。该试验的主要目的是评估重塑患者的长期功能结局是否劣于接受闭合复位和K线钉扎术的患者。该试验应包括742例急性骨折患者。这些患者将被包括在德国,瑞士和奥地利的30个医疗中心中。在知情同意后,将在急诊室就诊的所有5至11岁的前臂远端弯曲骨折的患者随机分组。主要终点是24个月后的Cooney得分。次要终点是12/24?月的放射位移等级。讨论角膜骨折的治疗尚需激烈辩论。建议在全身麻醉下进行主要操作和固定,以免发生错位。没有一项重大研究证明了操纵和固定优于单独固定的优势。如果重塑似乎是一种安全的选择,则可以在全身麻醉下进行操作,避免使用K线钉扎和销钉移除,从而节省大量成本。试用注册DRKS00004874,2013年10月30日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号