首页> 外文期刊>Trials >The CSAW Study (Can Shoulder Arthroscopy Work?) – a placebo-controlled surgical intervention trial assessing the clinical and cost effectiveness of arthroscopic subacromial decompression for shoulder pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

The CSAW Study (Can Shoulder Arthroscopy Work?) – a placebo-controlled surgical intervention trial assessing the clinical and cost effectiveness of arthroscopic subacromial decompression for shoulder pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

机译:CSAW研究(肩关节镜检查可以工作吗?)–一项安慰剂对照的手术干预试验,评估关节镜下肩峰下减压治疗肩部疼痛的临床和成本效益:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASAD) is a commonly performed surgical intervention for shoulder pain. The rationale is that removal of a bony acromial spur relieves symptoms by decompressing rotator cuff tendons passing through the subacromial space. However, the efficacy of this procedure is uncertain. The objective of this trial was to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ASAD in patients with subacromial pain using appropriate control groups, including placebo intervention. Methods/Design The trial is a three-group, parallel design, pragmatic, randomised controlled study. The intervention content for each group (ASAD, active monitoring with specialist reassessment (AMSR) and investigational shoulder arthroscopy only (AO)) enables assessment of (1) the efficacy of the surgery against no surgery; (2) the need for a specific component of the surgery—namely, removal of the bony spur; and (3) quantification of the placebo effect. Concealed allocation was performed using a 1:1:1 randomisation ratio and using age, sex, baseline Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and centre as minimisation criteria. The primary outcome measure is the OSS at 6 months post randomisation. A total of 300 patients recruited over 24 months from a minimum of 14 UK shoulder units over 24 months were required to detect a difference of 4.5 points on the OSS (standard deviation, 9) with 90% power and to allow for 15% loss to follow-up. Secondary outcomes include cost-effectiveness, pain, complications and patient satisfaction. A substantial qualitative research component is included. The primary analysis will be conducted on the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Sensitivity analysis will be used to assess the robustness of the results with regard to the underlying assumptions about missing data using multiple imputation. Discussion This trial uses an innovative design to account for the known placebo effects of surgery, but it also will delineate the mechanism for any benefit from surgery. The investigational AO group is considered a placebo intervention (not sham surgery), as it includes all components of subacromial decompression except the critical surgical element. Some discussion is also dedicated to the challenges of conducting placebo surgery trials. Trial registrations UK Clinical Research Network UKCRN12104. Registered 22 May 2012. International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial ISRCTN33864128 . Registered 22 June 2012. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01623011 . Registered 15 June 2012.
机译:背景关节镜下肩峰下减压术(ASAD)是肩痛的一种常见手术治疗方法。基本原理是去除骨顶肢骨刺可通过减压穿过肩峰下间隙的肩袖肌腱减轻症状。但是,此过程的疗效尚不确定。该试验的目的是使用适当的对照组,包括安慰剂干预,比较ASAD对肩峰以下疼痛患者的疗效和成本效益。方法/设计该试验是三组平行设计,实用,随机对照的研究。每组的干预内容(ASAD,仅通过专家评估进行主动监测(AMSR)和仅研究性肩关节镜检查(AO))就可以评估(1)相对于无手术的手术效果; (2)需要手术的特定组成部分,即去除骨刺; (3)量化安慰剂作用。隐蔽分配是使用1:1:1随机比率,并使用年龄,性别,基线牛津肩膀评分(OSS)和中心作为最小化标准进行的。主要结局指标是随机分组后6个月的OSS。在24个月内从至少14个英国肩部单位招募的300例患者,需要在24个月内以90%的功效检测OSS上的4.5点差异(标准偏差为9),并允许15%的损失跟进。次要结果包括成本效益,疼痛,并发症和患者满意度。包括大量的定性研究部分。初步分析将在修改后的意向治疗分析上进行。敏感性分析将用于使用多重插补来评估关于缺失数据的基本假设的结果的稳健性。讨论该试验采用创新的设计来说明已知的手术安慰剂作用,但同时也说明了从手术中获得任何好处的机制。 AO研究组被认为是安慰剂干预措施(不是假手术),因为它包括除关键性手术要素外的所有肩峰下减压组件。一些讨论还专门针对进行安慰剂手术试验的挑战。试验注册英国临床研究网络UKCRN12104。 2012年5月22日注册。国际标准随机对照试验ISRCTN33864128。于2012年6月22日注册。ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01623011。 2012年6月15日注册。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号