首页> 外文期刊>Trials >BASIC study: is intravaginal boric acid non-inferior to metronidazole in symptomatic bacterial vaginosis? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

BASIC study: is intravaginal boric acid non-inferior to metronidazole in symptomatic bacterial vaginosis? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:基础研究:在症状性细菌性阴道病中,阴道内硼酸是否不亚于甲硝唑?随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Bacterial vaginosis is associated with increased transmission of sexually transmitted infections, preterm labor, post-surgical infections, and endometritis. Current treatment for symptomatic bacterial vaginosis includes antibiotics, such as metronidazole, which are 70–80 % effective at one month after treatment and result in high recurrence rates and secondary candida infections. Intravaginal boric acid has been used for over a hundred years to treat vaginal infections, such as bacterial vaginosis. Boric acid is inexpensive, accessible, and has shown to be an effective treatment for other infections, such as vaginal candidiasis. To date, there has been no clinical trial evaluation of boric acid effectiveness to treat bacterial vaginosis. Methods/Design The BASIC (Boric Acid, Alternate Solution for Intravaginal Colonization) trial is a randomized, double-blinded, multicenter study. The study will enroll a minimum of 240 women of 16–50 years of age who are symptomatic with bacterial vaginosis. Eligible participants will have Amsel and Nugent scores confirming bacterial vaginosis. Women who are pregnant or menopausal or have other active co-infections will be excluded. Consenting participants who meet exclusion and inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: boric acid, metronidazole, or an inert placebo. Self-administration of treatment intravaginally for 10 days will be followed by clinical assessment at 7 and 30 days (days 17 and 40, respectively) after the end of the treatment phase. Primary outcome is a non-inferiority, per-protocol comparison of the effectiveness of boric acid with that of metronidazole at day 17, as measured by the Nugent score in 16–50 year olds. Secondary outcomes include: non-inferiority, intention-to-treat comparison of effectiveness of boric acid with that of metronidazole at day 17, analysis for both per-protocol and intention-to-treat at day 40, and safety considerations, including adverse effects requiring patient discontinuation of treatment. Discussion This study will be the first to determine whether intravaginal boric acid is non-inferior to metronidazole in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis in symptomatic women. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00799214 , registered online Nov 10, 2008.
机译:背景细菌性阴道病与性传播感染,早产,手术后感染和子宫内膜炎的传播增加有关。目前对症性细菌性阴道病的治疗包括抗生素,例如甲硝唑,在治疗后一个月有效率为70–80%,并导致高复发率和继发念珠菌感染。阴道内硼酸已经用于治疗阴道感染,例如细菌性阴道病已有一百多年了。硼酸价格便宜,易于获得,并已证明是治疗其他感染(如阴道念珠菌病)的有效方法。迄今为止,还没有临床试验评估硼酸治疗细菌性阴道病的有效性。方法/设计BASIC(硼酸,阴道内定植的替代溶液)试验是一项随机,双盲,多中心研究。该研究将招募至少240名16-50岁有细菌性阴道病症状的女性。符合条件的参与者将获得Amsel和Nugent分数,以确认细菌性阴道病。孕妇,更年期妇女或其他活跃的合并感染妇女将被排除在外。符合排除和纳入标准的同意参与者将被随机分配到三个治疗组之一:硼酸,甲硝唑或惰性安慰剂。阴道内自我给药治疗10天后,将在治疗阶段结束后的7天和30天(分别是第17天和40天)进行临床评估。主要结果是根据协议在16至50岁时通过Nugent评分对硼酸和甲硝唑的疗效进行了非劣效性,按方案比较。次要结果包括:非劣效性,在第17天进行硼酸和甲硝唑疗效的意向性治疗比较,在第40天时按方案和意向性治疗进行分析,以及安全性考虑因素,包括不良反应需要患者中止治疗。讨论本研究将首次确定阴道内硼酸在有症状女性细菌性阴道病的治疗中是否不劣于甲硝唑。试用注册ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00799214,在线注册于2008年11月10日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号