...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Cost-effectiveness of 40-hour versus 100-hour vocational rehabilitation on work participation for workers on sick leave due to subacute or chronic musculoskeletal pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of 40-hour versus 100-hour vocational rehabilitation on work participation for workers on sick leave due to subacute or chronic musculoskeletal pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:因亚急性或慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛而请病假的工人进行40小时与100小时职业康复的成本效益:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Although vocational rehabilitation is a widely advocated intervention for workers on sick leave due to subacute or chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain, the optimal dosage of effective and cost-effective vocational rehabilitation remains unknown. The objective of this paper is to describe the design of a non-inferiority trial evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 40-h multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation compared with 100-h multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation on work participation for workers on sick leave due to subacute or chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods/Design A non-inferiority study design will be applied. The study population consists of workers who are on part-time or full-time sick leave due to subacute or chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain. Two multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation programs following the bio-psychosocial approach will be evaluated in this study: 40-h vocational rehabilitation and 100-h vocational rehabilitation, both delivered over a maximum of 15 weeks. The 100-h vocational rehabilitation comprises five modules: work participation coordination, graded activity, cognitive behavioral therapy, group education, and relaxation. The 40-h vocational rehabilitation comprises work participation coordination and a well-reasoned choice from the other four modules. Four rehabilitation centers will participate in this study, each delivering both interventions. Patients will be randomized into one of the interventions, stratified for the duration of sick leave ( Discussion The results obtained from this study will be useful for vocational rehabilitation practice and will provide stakeholders with relevant insights into two versions of vocational rehabilitation. Trial registration Dutch Trial Register identifier: NTR4362 (registered 17 March 2014).
机译:背景技术尽管由于亚急性或慢性非特异性肌肉骨骼疼痛,职业康复是病假工人的广泛倡导干预措施,但有效和具有成本效益的职业康复的最佳剂量仍然未知。本文的目的是描述一项非劣效性试验的设计,该试验评估了40小时多学科职业康复与100小时多学科职业康复相比,因亚急性或慢性病休病假的工人参加工作的有效性和成本效益。慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛。方法/设计将应用非自卑性研究设计。研究人群包括由于亚急性或慢性非特定性肌肉骨骼疼痛而休假或全职病假的工人。在这项研究中,将评估遵循生物心理社会学方法的两个多学科职业康复计划:40小时职业康复和100小时职业康复,均在15周内完成。 100小时的职业康复包括五个模块:工作参与协调,分级活动,认知行为疗法,小组教育和放松。 40小时的职业康复包括工作参与协调和其他四个模块的合理选择。四个康复中心将参加这项研究,每个中心都提供两种干预措施。患者将被随机分配到其中一种干预措施中,并根据病假的持续时间进行分层(讨论)。这项研究获得的结果将对职业康复实践有用,并将为利益相关者提供关于两种职业康复形式的相关见解。注册标识符:NTR4362(2014年3月17日注册)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号