...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Thoracic Epidural analgesia versus Rectus Sheath Catheters for open midline incisions in major abdominal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme (TERSC): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Thoracic Epidural analgesia versus Rectus Sheath Catheters for open midline incisions in major abdominal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme (TERSC): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

机译:在增强恢复程序(TERSC)中进行大型腹部手术中的开放中线切口胸膜硬膜外镇痛与直肌鞘导管的比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is recommended for post-operative pain relief in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery via a midline incision. However, the effectiveness of TEA is variable with high failure rates reported post-operatively. Common side effects such as low blood pressure and motor block can reduce mobility and hinder recovery, and a number of rare but serious complications can also occur following their use. Rectus sheath catheters (RSC) may provide a novel alternative approach to somatic analgesia without the associated adverse effects of TEA. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of both techniques in terms of pain relief, patient experience, post-operative functional recovery, safety and cost-effectiveness. Methods/design This is a single-centre randomised controlled non-blinded trial, which also includes a nested qualitative study. Over a two-year period, 132 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery via a midline incision will be randomised to receive either TEA or RSC for post-operative analgesia. The primary outcome measures pain scores on moving from a supine to a sitting position at 24?hours post wound closure, and the patient experience between groups evaluated through in-depth interviews. Secondary outcomes include pain scores at rest and on movement at other time points, opiate consumption, functional recovery, morbidity and cost-effectiveness. Discussion This will be the first randomised controlled trial comparing thoracic epidurals to ultrasound-guided rectus sheath catheters in adults undergoing elective midline laparotomy. The standardised care provided by an Enhanced Recovery Programme makes this a comparison between two complex pain packages and not simply two analgesic techniques, in order to ascertain if RSC is a viable alternative to TEA. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN81223298 (16 January 2014).
机译:背景技术经中线切口进行大腹部手术的患者,建议采用胸膜硬膜外镇痛(TEA)减轻术后疼痛。但是,TEA的有效性因术后报道的高失败率而异。常见的副作用,例如低血压和运动障碍,可能会降低活动能力并阻碍康复,使用后还会发生许多罕见但严重的并发症。直肌鞘导管(RSC)可以提供一种新颖的替代方法来镇痛,而不会引起TEA的不利影响。这项研究的目的是比较两种技术在缓解疼痛,患者经验,术后功能恢复,安全性和成本效益方面的功效。方法/设计这是一项单中心随机对照非盲试验,其中还包括嵌套定性研究。在两年的时间里,将通过中线切口进行腹部大手术的132例患者随机分配接受TEA或RSC进行术后镇痛。主要结局指标是在伤口闭合后24小时从仰卧位转入坐位时的疼痛评分,并通过深入访谈评估两组之间的患者体验。次要结果包括在其他时间点休息和运动时的疼痛评分,鸦片消费,功能恢复,发病率和成本效益。讨论这将是在接受择期中线剖腹手术的成人中比较胸腔硬膜外腔与超声引导的直肌鞘管的随机对照试验。为了确定RSC是否可以替代TEA,Enhanced Recovery Program提供的标准化护理使这是两个复杂的疼痛套餐之间的比较,而不仅仅是两个止痛技术之间的比较。试用注册当前对照试验ISRCTN81223298(2014年1月16日)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号