首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Intrathecal opioid versus ultrasound guided fascia iliaca plane block for analgesia after primary hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised, blinded, noninferiority controlled trial
【24h】

Intrathecal opioid versus ultrasound guided fascia iliaca plane block for analgesia after primary hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised, blinded, noninferiority controlled trial

机译:鞘内阿片类药物与超声引导下ilia肌筋膜平面阻滞在原发性髋关节置换术后的镇痛作用:一项随机,无盲,非劣效对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Hip replacement surgery is increasingly common due to an ageing population, and rising levels of obesity. The provision of excellent pain relief with minimal side effects is important in order to facilitate patient mobilisation and rehabilitation. Spinal opioids provide excellent analgesia but are associated with adverse effects. The fascia-iliaca block is an alternative technique which provides analgesia to the nerves innervating the hip. The success of fascia iliaca blocks has been demonstrated to be superior when using ultrasound compared to landmark techniques. However, the clinical benefit of this improvement has yet to be investigated. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block with spinal morphine for hip replacement surgery. Methods/Design This study is a randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled, noninferiority trial. Patients scheduled to undergo unilateral primary hip arthroplasty will receive a study information sheet and consent will be obtained in keeping with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients will be randomised to receive either; (i) Ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block using levobupivacaine, plus spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine containing no morphine, or (ii) sham ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block performed with sterile saline, and spinal anaesthesia containing hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.1 mg of spinal morphine. A total of 108 patients will be recruited. Primary outcome is post-operative morphine consumption in a 24 hour period. Secondary outcomes include; pain scores at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours, episodes of respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea and vomiting, pruritus, sedation, time to first mobilisation and patient satisfaction. Conclusions There are no studies to date comparing ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block with spinal morphine for pain control after hip arthroplasty. If the ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block provides pain relief which is not inferior to spinal morphine, then morphine could be removed from the spinal injection. This could reduce side effects and improve patient safety. Trial registration This study has been approved by the West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee 4 (reference no. 10/S0704/43) and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (reference no. NCT01217294 ).
机译:背景技术由于人口老龄化和肥胖程度的提高,髋关节置换术越来越普遍。为了使患者动员和康复,提供具有最小副作用的出色的疼痛缓解是重要的。脊髓阿片类药物可提供出色的镇痛效果,但会产生不良反应。 -肌筋膜阻滞是一种替代技术,可为支配臀部的神经提供镇痛作用。与标志性技术相比,当使用超声波时,ilia筋膜阻滞的成功已被证明是卓越的。但是,这种改善的临床益处尚待研究。这项研究的目的是比较超声引导guided骨筋膜阻滞与脊髓吗啡在髋关节置换手术中的疗效和安全性。方法/设计本研究是一项随机,盲,安慰剂对照,非劣效性试验。计划进行单侧原发性髋关节置换术的患者将收到研究信息表,并将根据赫尔辛基宣言获得同意。患者将被随机分配接受; (i)使用左旋布比卡因进行超声引导的ine肌筋膜阻滞,加不包含吗啡的高压布比卡因进行麻醉,或(ii)使用无菌生理盐水进行深超声引导的膜肌阻滞,并使用高压布比卡因和0.1 mg脊髓吗啡进行脊髓麻醉。总共将招募108名患者。主要结局是术后24小时内服用吗啡。次要结果包括: 3、6、12、24、36和48小时的疼痛评分,呼吸抑制,低血压,恶心和呕吐,瘙痒,镇静,首次动员时间和患者满意度的发作。结论迄今为止,尚无研究比较超声引导的ilia肌筋膜阻滞与脊髓吗啡在髋关节置换术后疼痛控制方面的差异。如果超声引导的fa肌筋膜阻滞提供不低于脊髓吗啡的止痛效果,则可以从脊髓注射中去除吗啡。这样可以减少副作用并提高患者安全性。试验注册该研究已得到苏格兰西部研究伦理委员会4的批准(参考号10 / S0704 / 43),并在ClinicalTrials.gov上进行了注册(参考号NCT01217294)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号