首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial
【24h】

Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial

机译:胸痛选择决策辅助在低危胸痛急诊科患者中的有效性:一项多中心随机试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Chest pain is the second most common reason patients visit emergency departments (EDs) and often results in very low-risk patients being admitted for prolonged observation and advanced cardiac testing. Shared decision-making, including educating patients regarding their 45-day risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and management options, might safely decrease healthcare utilization. Methods/Design This is a protocol for a multicenter practical patient-level randomized trial to compare an intervention group receiving a decision aid, Chest Pain Choice (CPC), to a control group receiving usual care. Adults presenting to five geographically and ethnically diverse EDs who are being considered for admission for observation and advanced cardiac testing will be eligible for enrollment. We will measure the effect of CPC on (1) patient knowledge regarding their 45-day risk for ACS and the available management options (primary outcome); (2) patient engagement in the decision-making process; (3) the degree of conflict patients experience related to feeling uninformed (decisional conflict); (4) patient and clinician satisfaction with the decision made; (5) the rate of major adverse cardiac events at 30?days; (6) the proportion of patients admitted for advanced cardiac testing; and (7) healthcare utilization. To assess these outcomes, we will administer patient and clinician surveys immediately after each clinical encounter, obtain video recordings of the patient-clinician discussion, administer a patient healthcare utilization diary, analyze hospital billing records, review the electronic medical record, and conduct telephone follow-up. Discussion This multicenter trial will robustly assess the effectiveness of a decision aid on patient-centered outcomes, safety, and healthcare utilization in low-risk chest pain patients from a variety of geographically and ethnically diverse EDs. Trial registration NCT01969240 .
机译:背景胸痛是患者去急诊室(ED)的第二个最普遍的原因,并且经常导致极低风险的患者因长期观察和先进的心脏检查而入院。共同的决策,包括教育患者45天的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)风险和管理选择,可能会安全地降低医疗保健利用率。方法/设计这是一项针对多中心实际患者水平的随机试验的方案,用于比较接受决策援助(胸痛选择)(CPC)的干预组与接受常规护理的对照组的比较。呈现给五个地理和种族不同的ED的成年人,正在考虑接受观察和高级心脏检查,将有资格参加。我们将评估CPC对(1)患者有关其ACS的45天风险和可用管理方案(主要结果)的知识; (2)患者参与决策过程; (3)患者经历与不知情的感觉有关的冲突程度(决定性冲突); (4)患者和临床医生对该决定的满意程度; (5)30天时主要不良心脏事件发生率; (6)接受高级心脏检查的患者比例; (七)医疗卫生利用。为了评估这些结果,我们将在每次临床遭遇后立即进行患者和临床医生调查,获取患者与临床医生讨论的视频记录,管理患者医疗保健利用日记,分析医院账单记录,查看电子病历并进行电话跟踪-向上。讨论该多中心试验将针对来自不同地理位置和种族的各种急诊室的低风险胸痛患者,以患者为中心的结果,安全性和医疗保健利用率,对决策辅助的有效性进行有力评估。试用注册NCT01969240。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号