...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Reflecting on the methodological challenges of recruiting to a United Kingdom-wide, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial in gynaecology outpatient settings
【24h】

Reflecting on the methodological challenges of recruiting to a United Kingdom-wide, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial in gynaecology outpatient settings

机译:反思在妇科门诊患者中招募全英国范围,多中心,随机对照试验的方法学挑战

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Successful recruitment of participants to any trial is central to its success. Trial results are routinely published, and recruitment is often cited to be slower and more difficult than anticipated. This article reflects on the methodological challenges of recruiting women with prolapse attending United Kingdom (UK) gynaecology outpatient clinics to a multi-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of physiotherapy, and the systems put in place in an attempt to address them. Methods Gynaecology outpatients with symptomatic prolapse were to be recruited over a 16-month period from 14 UK hospitals and one New Zealand hospital. Eligible women were informed about the trial by their gynaecologist and informed consent was obtained by the central trial office. Recruitment difficulties were encountered early on, and a number of strategies were employed to try to improve recruitment. Results Some strategies were more successful than others and they differed in the resources required. Actions that facilitated recruitment included increasing recruiting centres to 23 UK and two international hospitals, good centre support, using processes embedded in clinical practice, and good communication between the trial office, collaborators and participants. Collaborator incentives, whereby staff involved received the benefit immediately, were more successful than a nominal monetary payment per woman randomised. Barriers to recruitment included fewer eligible women than anticipated, patient’s preference to receive active treatment rather than allocation to the control group, lack of support staff and high staff turnover. Geographical variations in Primary Care Trust Research Management and Governance approval systems and general practitioner (GP) referral procedures also impacted negatively on recruitment. Conclusions Our article reflects on the methodological challenges of recruiting to a multi-centre RCT in a UK gynaecology setting. Effective interventions included increasing the number of recruiting centres and providing collaborator incentives. Barriers to recruitment included fewer eligible women than anticipated, patient’s preference to be allocated to the treatment group, lack of support staff, and variations in approval systems and GP referral procedures. To improve the evidence base on clinical trial recruitment, trialists need to publish their experiences and lessons learned. Future RCTs should evaluate, where possible, the effect of strategies designed to improve recruitment and retention. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN35911035
机译:背景技术成功招募任何试验的参与者是其成功的关键。审判结果会定期发布,而且经常会认为招募比预期的要慢且难。本文反映了招募在英国(UK)妇科门诊就诊的脱垂妇女参加物理治疗的多中心随机对照试验(RCT)的方法学挑战,并建立了旨在解决这些问题的系统。方法招募有症状脱垂的妇科门诊患者,在16个月内从14家英国医院和1家新西兰医院中招募。合格的妇女由妇科医生告知了有关试验的信息,中央审判办公室已获得知情同意。招聘困难在早期就遇到了,采用了许多策略来尝试改善招聘。结果有些策略比其他策略更成功,并且所需资源不同。促进招募的行动包括将招募中心增加到英国23家和两家国际医院,提供良好的中心支持,使用嵌入在临床实践中的流程,以及审判办公室,合作者和参与者之间的良好沟通。合作者的奖励措施使参与其中的工作人员立即获得了好处,比随机分配给每个妇女的名义货币付款更为成功。招募的障碍包括:合格的女性比预期的要少;患者更愿意接受积极治疗而不是分配给对照组;缺乏支持人员;人员流动率高。基层医疗信托研究管理和治理批准系统以及全科医生(GP)推荐程序的地域差异也对招聘产生了负面影响。结论我们的文章反映了在英国妇科环境中招募到多中心RCT所面临的方法学挑战。有效的干预措施包括增加招聘中心的数量和提供合作者激励措施。招募的障碍包括:合格的女性比预期的要少,患者对治疗组的偏好,缺乏支持人员以及审批系统和全科医生转诊程序的差异。为了改善基于临床试验招募的证据,试验人员需要发表他们的经验和教训。未来的RCT应该在可能的情况下评估旨在提高招聘和保留率的策略的效果。试用注册电流对照试验ISRCTN35911035

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号