...
首页> 外文期刊>Trials >Routine versus selective cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischemic heart failure – OUTSMART-HF: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (IMAGE-HF (heart failure) project 1-B)
【24h】

Routine versus selective cardiac magnetic resonance in non-ischemic heart failure – OUTSMART-HF: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (IMAGE-HF (heart failure) project 1-B)

机译:非缺血性心力衰竭的常规与选择性心脏磁共振– OUTSMART-HF:一项随机对照试验的研究方案(IMAGE-HF(心力衰竭)项目1-B)

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Imaging has become a routine part of heart failure (HF) investigation. Echocardiography is a first-line test in HF given its availability and it provides valuable diagnostic and prognostic information. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is an emerging clinical tool in the management of patients with non-ischemic heart failure. Current ACC/AHA/CCS/ESC guidelines advocate its role in the detection of a variety of cardiomyopathies but there is a paucity of high quality evidence to support these recommendations. The primary objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic yield of routine cardiac magnetic resonance versus standard care (that is, echocardiography with only selective use of CMR) in patients with non-ischemic heart failure. The primary hypothesisis that the routine use of CMR will lead to a more specific diagnostic characterization of the underlying etiology of non-ischemic heart failure. This will lead to a reduction in the non-specific diagnoses of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and HF with preserved ejection fraction. Design Tertiary care sites in Canada and Finland, with dedicated HF and CMR programs, will randomize consecutive patients with new or deteriorating HF to routine CMR or selective CMR. All patients will undergo a standard clinical echocardiogram and the interpreter will assign the most likely HF etiology. Those undergoing CMR will also have a standard examination and will be assigned a HF etiology based upon the findings. The treating physician’s impression about non-ischemic HF etiology will be collected following all baseline testing (including echo ± CMR). Patients will be followed annually for 4 years to ascertain clinical outcomes, quality of life and cost. The expected outcome is that the routine CMR arm will have a significantly higher rate of infiltrative, inflammatory, hypertrophic, ischemic and ‘other’ cardiomyopathy than the selective CMR group. Discussion This study will be the first multicenter randomized, controlled trial evaluating the role of CMR in non-ischemic HF. Non-ischemic HF patients will be randomized to routine CMR in order to determine whether there are any gains over management strategies employing selective CMR utilization. The insight gained from this study should improve appropriate CMR use in HF. Trial registration NCT01281384 .
机译:背景成像已成为心力衰竭(HF)研究的常规部分。考虑到超声心动图的可用性,它是心衰的一线检查,它可提供有价值的诊断和预后信息。心脏磁共振(CMR)是治疗非缺血性心力衰竭患者的新兴临床工具。当前的ACC / AHA / CCS / ESC指南主张其在各种心肌病的检测中的作用,但缺乏高质量的证据来支持这些建议。这项研究的主要目的是比较非缺血性心力衰竭患者常规心脏磁共振与标准治疗(即仅选择使用CMR的超声心动图)的诊断率。主要假设是常规使用CMR将导致非缺血性心力衰竭的潜在病因更具体的诊断特征。这将导致射血分数得以保留的特发性扩张型心肌病和HF的非特异性诊断减少。在加拿大和芬兰设计的三级护理中心,采用专用的HF和CMR计划,会将具有新的或恶化的HF的连续患者随机分为常规CMR或选择性CMR。所有患者都将接受标准的临床超声心动图检查,口译人员将分配最可能的HF病因。接受CMR的患者也将接受标准检查,并根据发现结果接受HF病因学检查。在所有基线测试(包括回声±CMR)之后,将收集主治医生对非缺血性HF病因的印象。每年将对患者进行4年随访,以确定临床结果,生活质量和费用。预期的结果是,常规CMR组的浸润性,炎性,肥厚性,缺血性和“其他”心肌病的发生率将高于选择性CMR组。讨论该研究将是第一个评估CMR在非缺血性HF中的作用的多中心随机对照试验。非缺血性HF患者将被随机分配至常规CMR,以确定在采用选择性CMR利用的管理策略方面是否有任何收益。从这项研究中获得的见识应可以改善心力衰竭中适当的CMR使用。试用注册NCT01281384。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号