首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine >Stable Xenon Computed Tomography Cerebral Blood Flow Measurement In Neurological Disease: Review And Protocols
【24h】

Stable Xenon Computed Tomography Cerebral Blood Flow Measurement In Neurological Disease: Review And Protocols

机译:神经疾病中稳定的氙计算机断层扫描脑血流量测量:审查和协议。

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction Abnormalities in cerebral blood flow (CBF) are implicated in the pathophysiology of increasingly large number of neurological and neurosurgical disorders 1. The most obvious evidence of this awareness is the importance now given to maintaining an adequate cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in a wide variety of conditions. It is surprising that in spite of this knowledge, measurement of CBF has not become a routine tool in the management of patients with neurological illnesses. While CBF studies are increasingly the subject of research and publication, the vast majority of institutions caring for these patients do not have the equipment to perform this measurement, and only a small number of centers that have the capability use it in routine management. This is due to many factors including cost, ease of performance, concerns about safety and the current lack of ability to integrate the results into a standard patient care protocol.The list of diseases in which CBF abnormalities are implicated is growing as our knowledge of the underlying processes increases. Ischemia, besides the being the obvious pathology in stroke, is now also known to have a significant effect on outcome in head injuries 2, 3, 4, subarachnoid hemorrhage 5, 6 and in raised intracranial pressure (ICP) due to various causes. Hyperemia can have equally deleterious effects in head injuries 7, and in patients who have had endovascular or surgical treatment for carotid artery disease or arteriovenous malformations 8. Besides these primarily neurological diseases, abnormalities in CBF have been detected in psychiatric disorders 9, 10 and implicated in several systemic illnesses with neurological manifestations such as hepatic and renal failure 11.The awareness that CBF abnormalities are an important cause of pathophysiology has resulted in the need for an ability to measure the flow. Measurement will enable the physician to decide whether the cause of a deficit is abnormal flow, whether ischemic or hyperemic. It can also be used to assess the effectiveness of therapy aimed at modifying the abnormal state and therefore as a guide to further intervention. Measurement of cerebral blood flow Numerous techniques exist which are currently used clinically to estimate or measure CBF. These can be roughly classified into direct and indirect methods: Direct 1) Kety and Schmidt performed the first measurements of CBF in humans using nitrous oxide and the Fick principle 12. Since nitrous oxide is inert and diffuses rapidly into the brain, CBF could be calculated if its concentration could be simultaneously measured in the arterial blood entering the head and the venous blood leaving it, using a previously established blood-brain partition coefficient. This method is difficult to perform, as it requires multiple samples of arterial and internal jugular venous blood. It does not yield regional measurements but is presumed to be a measurement of global CBF; this also can be questioned because the variation in the dural sinuses and the torcula call into question the reliability of a sample taken from one jugular vein. A major advantage of this technique is that simultaneous measurement of blood gases and metabolites can be performed to assess cerebral metabolism. 2) 133Xe: the use of radioisotopes to measure cerebral blood flow was first reported by Ingvar et al 13 in 1961, who used 85Kr to measure CBF in exposed brain. Later 133Xe was found to be more effective because it is a gamma emitter and can be measured extracranially. It is also safer because of a shorter half-life. The initial techniques were complicated involved injecting the isotope directly into the carotid artery, but the process was considerably simplified in 1967 by Obrist et al 14, 15 who developed a technique of inhaling the isotope as a gas, and even further simplified now by administering it as a solution in an intravenous injection. The procedure involves knowledge of the arterial concentration of
机译:引言脑血流量异常(CBF)与越来越多的神经系统疾病和神经外科疾病的病理生理有关。1.这种认识的最明显证据是,现在在保持广泛的脑灌注压(CPP)方面的重要性已得到重视。各种条件。令人惊讶的是,尽管掌握了这些知识,但CBF的测量还没有成为神经疾病患者管理中的常规工具。尽管CBF研究越来越成为研究和发表的主题,但照顾这些患者的绝大多数机构都没有设备来执行此测量,只有少数有能力的中心将其用于日常管理。这是由于许多因素造成的,包括成本,操作简便性,对安全性的担忧以及当前缺乏将结果整合到标准患者护理方案中的能力。随着我们对CBF异常的了解,涉及CBF异常的疾病清单正在不断增加。基本流程增加。缺血除了是中风的明显病理外,现在还已知对因各种原因导致的颅脑损伤2、3、4,蛛网膜下腔出血5、6以及颅内压升高(ICP)的结果具有重大影响。充血对头部受伤7以及对颈动脉疾病或动静脉畸形进行过血管内或外科治疗的患者同样具有有害作用。除了这些主要的神经系统疾病外,在精神疾病9、10中还发现了CBF异常,并与之相关在一些具有神经系统表现的系统性疾病中,例如肝和肾衰竭11.认识到CBF异常是病理生理的重要原因,因此需要测量血流的能力。测量将使医生能够确定缺陷的原因是血流异常,是缺血性还是充血性。它也可用于评估旨在改变异常状态的疗法的有效性,因此可作为进一步干预的指南。脑血流量的测量目前存在许多用于临床上估算或测量CBF的技术。可将其大致分为直接方法和间接方法:直接方法1)Kety和Schmidt使用一氧化二氮和Fick原理对人的CBF进行了首次测量。由于一氧化二氮是惰性的并且迅速扩散到大脑中,因此可以计算出CBF如果可以使用先前确定的血脑分配系数同时测量进入头部的动脉血和离开头部的静脉血中的浓度。该方法难以执行,因为它需要多个动脉和颈内静脉血样本。它不产生区域测量值,但被认为是全球CBF的测量值。这也可能引起质疑,因为硬脑膜窦和硬脑膜的变化使从一条颈静脉采集的样本的可靠性受到质疑。该技术的主要优点是可以同时测量血气和代谢产物以评估脑代谢。 2)133Xe:Ingvar等[13]于1961年首次报道使用放射性同位素测量脑血流量,他们使用85Kr来测量裸露的脑中的CBF。后来发现133Xe更有效,因为它是伽马发射器,可以在颅外测量。由于半衰期更短,因此更安全。最初的技术涉及将同位素直接注入到颈动脉中,因此很复杂,但是在1967年,Obrist等[14,15]开发了一种将同位素作为气体吸入的技术,大大简化了该过程,现在通过对其进行管理进一步简化了该过程。作为静脉注射液。该程序涉及动脉浓度的知识

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号