首页> 外文期刊>The Internet Journal of Emergency Medicine >Acquired Lateral Rectus Palsy: A Case Report
【24h】

Acquired Lateral Rectus Palsy: A Case Report

机译:获得性外侧直肌麻痹:一例报告

获取原文
           

摘要

Case An 86 year old man with a history of hypertension and diabetes presented to the ED with complaints of blurred vision for one week. The vision blurriness increased with left lateral gaze, and was not preceded by trauma or fever. There were associated headaches, none sudden-onset, with no vomiting or neck stiffness. The patient had never had blurred vision of this type before, but reported right-sided sensory loss after a head injury some 70 years prior—this sensory loss remained stable.;Discussion Acquired paresis of the lateral rectus presents with horizontal diplopia, and has a broad differential, one which includes many serious and potentially life-threatening pathologies (1). While pathology of the lateral rectus muscle itself is possible, a palsy of the abducens nerve (CN VI) is far more prevalent. While the majority of cases are not immediately life-threatening (greater than 40% of cases, by several meta-analyses (2,3)), these serious etiologies must be ruled out before disposition from the Emergency Department (ED). Central ischemic syndromes can cause palsies of VI, however the ischemia is rarely confined to the VI nucleus, and therefore is predominantly associated with other focal neurological deficits (4). The etiologies of isolated VI palsy which necessitate urgent/emergent diagnosis and treatment include mass lesions (neoplasms should be under particular suspicion with pediatric presentations of VI palsy), vascular inflammatory conditions such as temporal arteritis, aneurysms (both pre- and post-rupture), cavernous sinus syndromes (such as cavernous sinus thrombosis), multiple sclerosis, and Lyme disease (1). Because the above etiologies must be ruled out in an urgent manner, MR imaging (with or without MR angiography) is required in nearly all cases of new VI palsy before discharge from the hospital. After workup, the less emergent diagnoses can be considered, the most common of which is a vasculopathy secondary to diabetes, which was our patient’s final diagnosis. Unfortunately, a significant percentage of patients, even after workup, retain a diagnosis of ‘idiopathic’ palsy of VI (5).
机译:病例一位有高血压和糖尿病病史的86岁男子在ED时出现ED,主诉视力模糊。视力模糊随着左眼凝视而增加,并且没有外伤或发烧。伴有头痛,无突然发作,无呕吐或颈部僵硬。患者以前从未见过这种类型的视力模糊,但在70年前发生头部受伤后报告右侧感觉减退-这种感觉减退保持稳定。;讨论后天性直肌麻痹表现为水平复视,并具有广泛的差异,其中包括许多严重且可能威胁生命的疾病(1)。尽管可能会出现直肠外肌本身的病理,但外展神经麻痹(CN VI)更为普遍。虽然大多数病例并没有立即危及生命(通过数次荟萃分析,超过40%的病例[2,3]),但在排除急诊室(ED)之前,必须排除这些严重病因。中枢缺血综合征可引起VI麻痹,但是缺血很少局限于VI核,因此主要与其他局灶性神经功能缺损有关(4)。需要紧急/紧急诊断和治疗的孤立性VI麻痹的病因包括大规模病变(特别怀疑小儿表现为VI麻痹的肿瘤),诸如颞动脉炎,动脉瘤(破裂前和破裂后)之类的血管炎性疾病,海绵窦综合征(如海绵窦血栓形成),多发性硬化症和莱姆病(1)。由于必须紧急排除上述病因,因此在几乎所有新的VI麻痹病例中,出院前都需要MR成像(有或没有MR血管造影)。进行检查后,可以考虑不太紧急的诊断,其中最常见的是继发于糖尿病的血管病变,这是我们患者的最终诊断。不幸的是,即使经过检查,仍有相当多的患者保留了VI的“特发性”麻痹的诊断(5)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号