首页> 外文期刊>Thrombosis Journal >External validation of prognostic rules for early post-pulmonary embolism mortality: assessment of a claims-based and three clinical-based approaches
【24h】

External validation of prognostic rules for early post-pulmonary embolism mortality: assessment of a claims-based and three clinical-based approaches

机译:早期验证肺栓塞后早期死亡的预后规则的外部验证:评估基于索赔的方法和基于三种临床方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Studies show the In-hospital Mortality for Pulmonary embolism using Claims daTa (IMPACT) rule can accurately identify pulmonary embolism (PE) patients at low-risk of early mortality in a retrospective setting using only claims for the index admission. We sought to externally validate IMPACT, Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI), simplified PESI (sPESI) and Hestia for predicting early mortality. Methods We identified consecutive adults admitted for objectively-confirmed PE between 10/21/2010 and 5/12/2015. Patients undergoing thrombolysis/embolectomy within 48?h were excluded. All-cause in-hospital and 30?day mortality (using available Social Security Death Index data through January 2014) were assessed and prognostic accuracies of IMPACT, PESI, sPESI and Hestia were determined. Results Twenty-one (2.6?%) of the 807 PE patients died before discharge. All rules classified 26.1–38.3?% of patients as low-risk for early mortality. Fatality among low-risk patients was 0?% (sPESI and Hestia), 0.4?% (IMPACT) and 0.6?% (PESI). IMPACT’s sensitivity was 95.2?% (95?% confidence interval [CI]?=?74.1–99.8?%), and the sensitivities of clinical rules ranged from 91 (PESI)-100?% (sPESI and Hestia). Specificities of all rules ranged between 26.8 and 39.1?%. Of 573 consecutive patients in the 30?day mortality analysis, 33 (5.8?%) died. All rules classified 27.9–38.0?% of patients as low-risk, and fatality occurred in 0 (Hestia)-1.4?% (PESI) of low-risk patients. IMPACT’s sensitivity was 97.0?% (95%CI?=?82.5–99.8?%), while sensitivities for clinical rules ranged from 91 (PESI)-100?% (Hestia). Specificities of rules ranged between 29.6 and 39.8?%. Conclusion In this analysis, IMPACT identified low-risk PE patients with similar accuracy as clinical rules. While not intended for prospective clinical decision-making, IMPACT appears useful for identification of low-risk PE patient in retrospective claims-based studies.
机译:背景研究显示,使用Claims daTa(IMPACT)规则可以在回顾性背景下仅使用索引入院要求就可以准确地识别出早期死亡风险较低的肺栓塞(PE)患者,以准确确定其住院死亡率。我们试图从外部验证IMPACT,肺栓塞严重程度指数(PESI),简化PESI(sPESI)和Hestia以预测早期死亡率。方法我们确定了在2010年10月21日至2015年5月12日之间连续接受客观确认的体育锻炼的成年人。排除在48小时内接受溶栓/栓塞切除术的患者。评估了全因医院死亡率和30天死亡率(使用截至2014年1月的可用社会保障死亡指数数据),并确定了IMPACT,PESI,sPESI和Hestia的预后准确性。结果807名PE患者中有21名(2.6%)在出院前死亡。所有规则将26.1–38.3%的患者归为早期死亡的低风险。低危患者的死亡率为0%(sPESI和Hestia),0.4%(IMPACT)和0.6%(PESI)。 IMPACT的敏感度为95.2%(95%置信区间[CI] == 74.1–99.8%),临床规则的敏感度范围为91(PESI)-100%(sPESI和Hestia)。所有规则的特异性范围在26.8和39.1%之间。在30天的死亡率分析中,连续573例患者中有33例(5.8%)死亡。所有规则将27.9–38.0%的患者归为低危患者,而低危患者中有0(Hestia)-1.4%(PESI)发生了死亡。 IMPACT的敏感性为97.0%(95%CI =?82.5–99.8%),而临床规则的敏感性为91(PESI)-100%(Hestia)。规则的特异性介于29.6%和39.8%之间。结论在此分析中,IMPACT确定了与临床规则相似准确性的低危PE患者。尽管不打算用于前瞻性临床决策,但IMPACT在回顾性基于索赔的研究中似乎可用于识别低危PE患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号