首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. >Ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder compared with nebulized tobramycin and colistimethate sodium: a crossover study in cystic fibrosis patients with pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection
【24h】

Ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder compared with nebulized tobramycin and colistimethate sodium: a crossover study in cystic fibrosis patients with pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection

机译:与雾化妥布霉素和大黄酸内酯钠相比,妥布霉素吸入粉的使用更容易:肺铜绿假单胞菌感染的囊性纤维化患者的交叉研究

获取原文
           

摘要

This study assessed the ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP) administered via T-326 inhaler versus tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) and colistimethate sodium (COLI), both administered via nebulizers, for the treatment of chronic pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). A real-world, open-label, crossover, interventional phase IV study was conducted in CF patients aged ?6 years with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ?25% to ?90% predicted. Patients were assigned to one of the three treatment arms in Cycle 1; all patients received TIP in Cycle 2. Each cycle consisted of 28 days on and 28 days off the treatment. A total of 60 patients [mean (standard deviation) age, 27.6 (8.4) years] were allocated to three treatment arms [TIS/TIP (n = 14); COLI/TIP (n = 28); TIP/TIP (n = 18)] in Cycle 1. The mean total administration time, which included device setup and cleaning, in Cycle 1 versus Cycle 2 for TIS/TIP, COLI/TIP, and TIP/TIP arms were 37.0 versus 5.0 min, 16.4 versus 3.8 min, and 4.2 versus 3.4 min, respectively. The difference in mean total administration time was significantly shorter in Cycle 2 than in Cycle 1 for TIS/TIP (p = 0.0112) and COLI/TIP (p = 0.0016) arms. Overall, 12 patients were found to have contaminated devices across the two treatment cycles. In the TIP/TIP arm, no contamination of the T-326 inhaler was observed in either cycle. Treatment satisfaction, assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication and ACCEPT? questionnaire, was better overall for TIP compared with TIS and COLI. There were no unexpected adverse events and most were mild or moderate in intensity. The T-326 inhaler used to deliver TIP was easy to use, required shorter total administration time, and was much less frequently contaminated than the nebulizers. The safety findings observed for TIP were generally consistent with its established safety profile.
机译:这项研究评估了通过雾化器给药的T-326吸入器与妥布霉素吸入溶液(TIS)和大黄酸硫酸钠(COLI)一起使用妥布霉素吸入粉末(TIP)来治疗患者的慢性铜绿假单胞菌感染的易用性囊性纤维化(CF)。对年龄≥6岁的CF患者进行了真实的,开放的,交叉的,干预性的IV期研究,研究对象是≥6岁的CF患者,其呼气量在1秒内(FEV 1 )预计为≥25%至≥90% 。在第1周期中,将患者分配到三个治疗组之一。所有患者均在第2周期接受了TIP。每个周期包括治疗28天和治疗28天。将总共​​60例患者(平均(标准差)年龄,27.6(8.4)岁)分配到三个治疗组[TIS / TIP(n = 14); COLI / TIP(n = 28); TIP / TIP(n = 18)]在周期1中。TIS / TIP,COLI / TIP和TIP / TIP组的周期1与周期2的平均总管理时间(包括设备设置和清洁)为37.0对5.0分钟,16.4和3.8分钟以及4.2和3.4分钟。对于TIS / TIP(p = 0.0112)和COLI / TIP(p = 0.0016)组,第2周期的平均总给药时间差异明显小于第1周期。总体而言,在两个治疗周期中发现12名患者的器械受到污染。在TIP / TIP臂中,在两个周期中均未观察到T-326吸入器的污染。由药物治疗满意度问卷和接受评估评估的治疗满意度?调查问卷,总体而言,与TIS和COLI相比,在TIP方面更好。没有意外的不良事件,多数为轻度或中度。用于输送TIP的T-326吸入器易于使用,所需的总给药时间较短,并且比雾化器受污染的频率要低得多。对于TIP观察到的安全性发现通常与其确定的安全性特征相符。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号