...
首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic advances in medical oncology. >Comparative cost efficiency across the European G5 countries of originators and a biosimilar erythropoiesis-stimulating agent to manage chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with cancer
【24h】

Comparative cost efficiency across the European G5 countries of originators and a biosimilar erythropoiesis-stimulating agent to manage chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with cancer

机译:在欧洲五国集团(G5)发起国和使用生物仿制药促红细胞生成剂来控制癌症患者化疗引起的贫血中的相对成本效率

获取原文

摘要

Objectives: To evaluate the comparative cost efficiency across the European Union G5 countries of the erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) epoetin α (originator [Eprex?] and biosimilar [Binocrit?]; once weekly), epoetin β (NeoRecormon?; once weekly), and darbepoetin α (Aranesp?; once weekly or once every 3 weeks) under different scenarios of fixed and weight-based dosing in the management of chemotherapy-induced anemia. Methods: Direct costs of ESA treatment were calculated for one patient with cancer undergoing chemotherapy (six cycles at 3-week intervals) with ESA initiated at week 4 and continued for 15 weeks. Five scenarios were developed under fixed and weight-based dosing: continuous standard dose for 15 weeks; sustained dose escalation to 1.5× or double the standard dose at week 7, continued for 12 weeks; and discontinued dose escalation to 1.5× or double the standard dose at week 7 for a 3-week period, then 9 weeks of standard dose. Results: Under fixed dosing, the average cost of biosimilar epoetin α treatment across scenarios was €4643 (30,000 IU) or €6178 (40,000 IU). Corresponding estimates were €7168 for originator epoetin α, €7389 for epoetin β, €8299 for darbepoetin α once weekly, and €9221 for darbepoetin α once every 3 weeks. Under weight-based dosing, the average cost of biosimilar epoetin α treatment across scenarios was €4726. Corresponding estimates were €5484 for originator epoetin α, €5652 for epoetin β, and €8465 for both darbepoetin α once weekly and once every three weeks. Conclusion: Managing chemotherapy-induced anemia with biosimilar epoetin α is consistently cost efficient over treatment with originator epoetin α, epoetin β, and darbepoetin α under both fixed and weight-based dosing scenarios.
机译:目的:评估促红细胞生成素(ESA)促红细胞生成素α(起源[Eprex?]和生物仿制药[Binocrit?];每周一次),促红细胞生成素β(NeoRecormon ?;每周一次)在整个欧盟G5国家中的相对成本效率。 )和darbepoetinα(Aranesp ?;每周一次或每3周一次)在固定剂量和基于体重的不同给药方案下,用于治疗化疗引起的贫血。方法:计算一名接受化疗的癌症患者的ESA治疗直接费用(每3周间隔六个周期),并于第4周开始并持续15周。在固定和基于体重的剂量下开发了五种方案:连续标准剂量15周;在第7周持续将剂量升级至标准剂量的1.5倍或两倍,持续12周;并在第7周中将剂量逐步提高到标准剂量的1.5倍或两倍,持续3周,然后是9周标准剂量。结果:在固定剂量下,各种情景下生物仿制药鬼臼素α治疗的平均费用为4643欧元(30,000 IU)或6178欧元(40,000 IU)。相应的估计值是:原始epoetinα为7168欧元,epoetinβ为7389欧元,darbepoetinα为8299欧元,而darbepoetinα为每3周9221欧元。在基于体重的给药方式下,在各种情况下使用生物仿制药依泊汀α的平均费用为4726欧元。相应的估计值是:原始epoetinα5484欧元,epoetinβ5565欧元和darbepoetinα8465欧元,每周一次,每三周一次。结论:在固定和基于体重的给药方案下,使用仿生的依泊汀α治疗化学疗法引起的贫血始终比使用始发依泊汀α,依泊汀β和达比泊汀α治疗具有更高的成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号